This problem is common to every microcontroller, it is not new; if baud rate error is important you have to choose the correct crystaland this is not difficult since there are a lot of frequencies available. Of course the microcontroller clock will be lower then possible maximum. acetoel wrote: >Thanks >I noticed that today when looking at the Baud Rate error. With 20Mhz >is near 0.12% and with 14.xx is near 0.02%. It's quite a difference >and 1 Mhz in the processor clock will not make a significant >difference... >Thanks >Ezequiel > >--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Leon Heller" <leon_heller@h...> >wrote: > > >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: "acetoel" <acetoel@y...> >>To: <lpc2000@yahoogroups.com> >>Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 12:03 PM >>Subject: [lpc2000] LPC performance and Clock frecuency >> >> >> >> >>>Hello... >>>I have seen boards with 10MHz, 14.xxxMhz and 20Mhz. All with the >>> >>> >PLL > > >>>set so the chip runs at 60Mhz more or less... >>>But really, is there any difference if I use a 20Mhz crystal >>>oscilator than a 10Mhz? >>>IF there is no difference between crytal speed.Why so many >>> >>> >people > > >>>use the 14.xxxMhz crystal osc? >>> >>> >>It gives accurate baud rates for the UARTs. >> >>Leon >> >> > > > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [lpc2000] Re: LPC performance and Clock frecuency
2004-09-28 by Micron Engineering
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.