As an aside, you MAY have cured a wierd problem I am seeing. I am
also using Keil but with the LPC2294. I have a similar setup, MAM
enabled, PLL to 60MHz, VPBDIV is set to 1 & 10MHz clock. I am running
(and debugging) from internal FLASH.
Sometimes when debugging the timer interrupt would just stop working.
Everything else appears normal.
I have added a timer stop to the interrupt and it seems to have
helped. I don't want to appear too positive because as soon as I say
its OK it will fail again ;-)
void tc0 (void) __irq
{
T0TCR = 0; // Stop the clock while we do the interrupt
if(Auto == TRUE)DO_FAST_PULSE;
++timeval;
T0IR = 1; // Clear interrupt flag
T0TCR = 1; // ReStart the clock counter
VICVectAddr = 0; // Acknowledge Interrupt
}
The IRQ is now as above, and so far seems OK.
Thanks for your help!
cheers
Simon
--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Robert Adsett <subscriptions@a...>
wrote:
> At 12:42 AM 10/12/04 +0000, you wrote:
>
>
> >--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Robert Adsett <subscriptions@a...>
> >wrote:
> > > At 08:03 PM 10/11/04 +0000, you wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > >...Or am I doing something wrong?
> > > No answers, only questions.
> > >
> > > You are running at full speed, ie MAM fully enabled, a divisor
of 1
> > > on the peripheral bus?
> >
> >External clock is 10MHz, PLL is enabled and multiplies this to
60MHz.
> >MAM is enabled and MAMTIM is set to 3. VPBDIV is set to 1. As far
as
> >I can see, the core is working at 60MHz (e.g. baud rate divisors
work
> >out as expected for this value). Interestingly, I tried clocking TC
> >at this rate (i.e. one count every 16.7ns) with appropriate MR
> >values. The problem I've outlined was much much worse i.e.
interrupts
> >were lost almost immediately.
>
> Interesting, not sure what that means but interesting.Message
Re: Undocumented Timer Interrupt Feature, or Silicon Bug...
2004-10-12 by itsjustimpossible
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.