On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:25:15 -0000, tsvetanusunov wrote: > I'm not sure it is a bad idea. The 74LCX244 connects to the ARM and > gets its power (~3.3v) from the target board. The 74AC244 connects to the PC and gets its 5v from there. Bill, you don't follow Johns post - he is powering the target with 3V and the problem comes from LCX-to-AC direction as AC have threshold 3V for "1" high level and this is on the edge when LCX is powered with 3.1V only >The problem might be that the signal(s) > FROM the 74LCX244 TO the 74AC244 are not above the 74AC244's input threshold > level. Changing the 74AC244 to a 74ACT244 would lower the input threshold > requirement for the signal(s) coming from the 74LCX244 while still maintaining > compatablility with the PC signals. of course this is OK if *all* LPTs provide >4.5V which ACT will need as this part is powered from LPT Best regards Tsvetan ========================================================================= It was my understanding that the 74AC244 got its power indirectly from the PC's parallel port not from the target. -Bill
Message
Re: [lpc2000] Re: Olimex ARM JTAG Signals levels
2004-10-20 by Bill Knight
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.