Lpc2000

It will really be better. Do you have some suggestion of which flash 
to use?

--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "ggindele" <ggindele@y...> wrote:
> 
> Wouldn't be a flash stored unique key would be safer for the 
password
> encryption? There's a little inconvenience making every flash image
> randomized and the flash read protected, but can be done and cost
> could be lower than the DS2401 for volume. And the LPC-DS2401 
boundary
> is not protected in any way, the number can be sniffed, duplicated 
and
> so on.
> 
> --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Charles Manning <manningc2@a...> 
wrote:
> > The device Id is fixed per-device type according to
> "part_id-table.pdf" in 
> > the files section.
> > 
> > If you want a small, very low cost, unique per-unit id, I'd 
consider
> the 
> > Dallas  DS24011-wire silicon serial number. 
> > http://www.maxim-ic.com/quick_view2.cfm/qv_pk/2903
> > 
> > -- CHarles
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Wednesday 10 November 2004 01:40, you wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I would like to know if the device identification returned by 
IDCODE
> > > instruction is unique. I need to get one key to encrypt one 
password
> > > that can't be decrypted in another LPCxxxx. How could I do 
that?
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >