Lpc2000

I guess so far no one understood my point! When you use the philips 
bootloader from your code, you pass (address, data, clock) so far 
everything seems fine. Now, in the philips update bootloader 
document, there is a step telling us to enter the clock in the RAM 
buffer before running the code.

My concern is that, if I get a new chip with boot loader version 
1.63 (newest) and I use philips boot loader (address, data, clock) 
do I have to update the philips boot loader with the clock?


In other words, why the clock variable is needed twice? One, inside 
the boot loader and second passing it through code?


Gus

--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Robert Adsett <subscriptions@a...> 
wrote:
> At 02:38 PM 11/18/04 +0000, you wrote:
> >passing the clock speed in my code should be enough. I don't want 
to
> >re-do thier job! Or they program the chips for me before they 
ship.
> 
> I'm confused.  Are you complaining about loading an updated boot 
program or 
> about telling the micro what the clock speed is when it has to 
program flash?
> 
> If it's updating the boot program, check with Philips (and the 
errata?) and 
> find out what date codes you have to avoid and make it part of 
your 
> purchase spec.
> 
> The clock speed you are going to need no matter what part of the 
flash you 
> are updating (it's not getting burned into the flash after all).
> 
> Robert
> 
> " 'Freedom' has no meaning of itself.  There are always 
restrictions,
> be they legal, genetic, or physical.  If you don't believe me, try 
to
> chew a radio signal. "
> 
>                          Kelvin Throop, III