Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Message

Re: LPC Series - Good things gone bad...

2004-11-30 by R M

> I've been working with AVR for several years and I can tell you that
the AVR
> controllers does NOT need the pin to be forced high by hardware to
act as a
> master.
> 
> What you are describing is not possible for the LPC2106... the /SS pin
> *must* be tied high on hardware for the processor to act as a master
then
> you will need another pin to act as a /SS pin where in an AVR and a
lot of
> other processors you can control the actual /SS pin in software like you
> mentioned.

Bill just enlightened me with the issue you were describing. I wasn't
aware that the SS# pin had to be used irrelevant if there was a slave
that needed to be selected. Yes this is indeed an issue.

> Philip write that every GPIO pin is 5V tolerant if what I've been
hearing is
> correct then if you have some >3V digital TTL input on a pin that
shares the
> ADC your result on another ADC pin will be incorrect and if that's
true well
> then Philips should stop making their apprentice design their
processors !

Interesting - I wasn't aware of that problem either (again I haven't
used the ADC on the LPC series).

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.