Lpc2000

Hi,

I think Leon made it pretty clear that there are 
1. ARM groups not dedicated to an implementations
2. Options to start a dedicate group for a different device

The LPCgroup is 99% talking about available devices, the LPCs, we know
that many players intend to provide devices that compete with the LPCs
Motorola stating clearly on their website that these devices are only
available to tier one automotive customers (who are probably not very
active in this group), why bother and talk about it.

According to the moderator of this group, Leon it should be focused on
the LPC devices.

p.s. no offense , Bob

--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Anton Erasmus" <antone@s...> wrote:
> On 9 Dec 2004 at 10:18, Robert Adsett wrote:
> 
> > 
> > At 03:05 PM 12/9/04 +0000, you wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > > > The STMicroelectronics STR71x looks very good - some features are
> > > > superior to the LPC2xxx, such as 4 UARTS and 12-bit ADC.
> > > >
> > > > Is this group strictly Philips LPC2xxx? Should I go elsewhere if I
> > > > decide to use the STR71x? Are there any considerations to expand
> > > > the group's scope?
> > >
> > >As far as I can tell, there are three "small" ARMs of interest: SAM7,
> > >LPC2000, and STR7xx.
> > 
> > Four, there is the ADuC series from Analog Devices as well.
> 
> Five, once the Freescale (Formerly Motorola) MAC7000 device becomes
available
> for other non automotive customers. These  device look very good as
well. The 
> Freescale peripherals tend to be sorted out. One can generally
assume that one can 
> use one feature AND another feature. On the LPC2xxx devices it often
seems a case
> of one feature OR another feature.  
> 
>  
> [Stuff Snipped]
> 
> Regards
>    Anton Erasmus
> -- 
> A J Erasmus