At 10:14 PM 12/17/04 +0200, you wrote:
>On 9 Dec 2004 at 10:18, Robert Adsett wrote:
>
> >
> > At 03:05 PM 12/9/04 +0000, you wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > The STMicroelectronics STR71x looks very good - some features are
> > > > superior to the LPC2xxx, such as 4 UARTS and 12-bit ADC.
> > > >
> > > > Is this group strictly Philips LPC2xxx? Should I go elsewhere if I
> > > > decide to use the STR71x? Are there any considerations to expand
> > > > the group's scope?
> > >
> > >As far as I can tell, there are three "small" ARMs of interest: SAM7,
> > >LPC2000, and STR7xx.
> >
> > Four, there is the ADuC series from Analog Devices as well.
>
>Five, once the Freescale (Formerly Motorola) MAC7000 device becomes available
>for other non automotive customers. These device look very good as well. The
>Freescale peripherals tend to be sorted out. One can generally assume that
>one can
>use one feature AND another feature. On the LPC2xxx devices it often seems
>a case
>of one feature OR another feature.
This time when I went looking they actually appeared. However the smallest
I saw was in a 112 pin package. Not exactly in the same league. Did I
miss some?
Robert
" 'Freedom' has no meaning of itself. There are always restrictions,
be they legal, genetic, or physical. If you don't believe me, try to
chew a radio signal. "
Kelvin Throop, IIIMessage
RE: [lpc2000] LPC2xxx vs STR71x heresy?
2004-12-18 by Robert Adsett
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.