--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Curtis" <plc@r...> wrote: > Hi, > > > I think Leon made it pretty clear that there are 1. ARM > > groups not dedicated to an implementations 2. Options to > > start a dedicate group for a different device > > > > The LPCgroup is 99% talking about available devices, the > > LPCs, we know that many players intend to provide devices > > that compete with the LPCs Motorola stating clearly on their > > website that these devices are only available to tier one > > automotive customers (who are probably not very active in > > this group), why bother and talk about it. > > > > According to the moderator of this group, Leon it should be > > focused on the LPC devices. > > > > p.s. no offense , Bob > > I, for one, am interested in new devices that come along and am grateful > for the Rob's exposition of the new Freescale part. TI also have the > TMS470 becoming available through distribution, but we've yet to see one > of these parts. Me to, what about the new ATMEL low pin count devices, said to be alot cheaper then LPC and have more things in them! http://www.atmel.com/dyn/products/product_card.asp?part_id=3522 Any users group, anyone got a test drive of these? Reg KD
Message
Non-LPC (was Re: LPC2xxx vs STR71x heresy?)
2004-12-18 by dalenkarl
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.