Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Message

Re: [lpc2000] reserved bits of LPC2214

2004-12-20 by Lewin A.R.W. Edwards

> The user manual of LPC2214 states that a reserved bit should not be 
> set to 1. Is it because of future compatibility issues or is it a 
> hardware requirement?, i.e., what if we set a reserved bit to 1. 
> will the IC burn or present undefined behaviour?

If you need to ask this question, you're living too close to the
bleeding edge. Undefined bits might, if set:

1. do nothing
2. do nothing on current masks, but do something spectacularly strange
on a future mask
3. activate an internal test mode feature that fries your external
hardware by activating "impossible" combinations of I/Os

I'm not surprised you didn't get an answer. The behavior is undefined.
You would get exactly the same (non-) answer if you asked "How safe is
it to run the chip twenty degrees above its absolute maximum rating?"

-- 
Lewin A.R.W. Edwards
Consulting - http://www.zws.com/
Personal   - http://www.larwe.com/
Check out my books on embedded engineering!
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0750676094/zws-20/>
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0750677783/zws-20/>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.