Ultimately it is impossible to totally protect code. Perhaps the best you can prove is that somebody actually ripped you off. I routinely embed a copyright notice that is encrypted. The notice is functional, working code that cannot be removed easily. Does not appear as any kind of sensible ASCII, yet is revealed by a simple key. I also repeat the same messages in plain text. Which may help to reveal 'holes' in the memory map. Al ggindele wrote: > > I think we reached the consensus (with a little Philips help) that > code protection is available only in the 64 pin package, when the boot > loader >= 1.63 > > I wonder would that be a commercially reasonable protection when 2106 > is used with an external electronic serial number. The flash can be > customized to accept only the right serial number, but there's no code > protection against JTAG attack. > > What do you think? How long would it hold? > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > ADVERTISEMENT > <http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=1297p65qp/M=298184.5639630.6699735.3001176/D=groups/S=1706554205:HM/EXP=1103742242/A=2495208/R=0/SIG=11egg01lg/*http://www.netflix.com/Default?mqso=60188914> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Yahoo! Groups Links > > * To visit your group on the web, go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lpc2000/ > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > lpc2000-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:lpc2000-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>. > >
Message
Re: [lpc2000] Code protection again....
2004-12-21 by onestone
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.