Hi Michael I think the GCC compiler setting KEIL compare is without optimizing. What was the settings in your Optimization Level in CrossWorks ? Could you please mail me the two program source code Dhrystone v2.1 adn Whetstone to (john_2005@... )? best regards John --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Michael Johnson <mpj@r...> wrote: > I'll try again without html attachments. These numbers are for > CrossWorks 1.3 which uses version 3.4.1 of cc1.exe and cc1plus.exe from > the GNU Compiler Collection. We use our own C library with the go-faster > floating point code from gcclib. > > Dhrystone v2.1 > > ARM - Code size 9,498 bytes, 51,948 dhry/sec > THUMB - Code size 8,228 bytes, 48,192 dhry/sec > > Whetstone > > ARM - Code size 12,908 bytes, 2.4 MIPS > THUMB - Code size 10,608 bytes, 2.2 MIPS > > All benchmarks were executed on a Philips LPC2294 running at 60Mhz with > the MAM enabled. > > We use debug_stdio.h rather than stdio.h to keep the code size down. > Which could be considered to be cheating, but demonstrates that end > applications can do printf style debugging without a big code size increase. > > Regards > Michael
Message
Re: Dhrystone and Whetstone numbers
2005-01-05 by johnnorgaard2003
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.