At 06:48 PM 1/8/05 +0000, you wrote:
>On the subject of feeling the need to try to program above
>38400...we've got >200K of Thumb code and thousands of chips to ISP in
>the future...I know it will make a difference to our to our PCB
>subcontractor.
Yep for high volume it will make a big difference. It might be worth your
while to bootstrap to a higher baud rate. It's something I've been meaning
to work on when I get some time. The idea is the initial ISP would
download a a small download program to RAM and run it. It would then set
the serial port to a higher baud rate and use a binary download
protocol. The higher might get you a factor of 3 (if you can match rates
closely enough), the reduced overhead of the binary protocol would get you
a factor of 2. All this minus the actual programming overhead and the time
to download the initial stub.
Another option in volume might be to get the parts preprogrammed (assuming
they run identical programs). That gets it out of your subcontractors way
entirely.
For a lot of the stuff I've done functional testing made the programming
time disappear into the noise.
Robert
" 'Freedom' has no meaning of itself. There are always restrictions,
be they legal, genetic, or physical. If you don't believe me, try to
chew a radio signal. "
Kelvin Throop, IIIMessage
Re: [lpc2000] Re: Philips Flash Utility V2.2.0 (max baud rate = 38400???)
2005-01-08 by Robert Adsett
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.