Lpc2000

I had issues with 115K until I replaced the Xtal with a 14.7456MHz
one. Also, the lpc21isp.c from Martin Maurer is much more reliable.
Big plus using it you can customize, even to the extent of
automatically updating the bootlodaer if you wish.

--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Robert Adsett <subscriptions@a...> wrote:
> At 07:15 PM 1/8/05 +0000, you wrote:
> >I'll take a look next week on the actual data quality being received
> >transmitted at the CPU. I agree with you, from the table in the user
> >manual for the LPC2106 you can run at 115200 at 12.288 MHz, so at
> >12MHz even though we'll probably have a small percentage error per
> >bit, we should still be OK.
> 
> I think one of us is reading the wrong line.  I see 12.288 MHz
topping out 
> at 38400.
> 
> What is missing is a description of what is limiting the match so
that it 
> could be determined for the actual crystal used.  I expect it's a
divisor 
> issue.
> 
> If we knew what it was it should be straightforward to figure out which 
> baudrates will match (and maybe even switch crystals to meet
multiple neeeds).
> 
> Robert
> 
> 
> " 'Freedom' has no meaning of itself.  There are always restrictions,
> be they legal, genetic, or physical.  If you don't believe me, try to
> chew a radio signal. "
> 
>                          Kelvin Throop, III