Lpc2000

At 09:53 PM 2/15/05 +0200, Anton Erasmus wrote:
>On 15 Feb 2005 at 13:50, Robert Adsett wrote:
> > Just a thought (I haven't tested 3.4.3) but this looks what you would
> > expect if constant data wasn't being referenced correctly.  IE ld was
> > placing the data in flash and expecting it to be copied to RAM (and
> > the startup wasn't expecting the constant area to have to move).  Have
> > you checked your link script?
>Also the fact that it works correctly with no optimisation. If it was a
>problem with data not being copied to RAM when it should be, then I would 
>expect it to
>fail with no optimisation as well.

Very good point.

I think Rick's suggestion of asking the GNUARM group is probably a good one.

Robert

" 'Freedom' has no meaning of itself.  There are always restrictions,
be they legal, genetic, or physical.  If you don't believe me, try to
chew a radio signal. "

                         Kelvin Throop, III