Ah but I don't begrudge you your behemoths. I just think my end of the bar should be catered for too. When I attended the Philips seminar they actually stressed that they felt the market between 8 bitters and 32 bitters was closing, both in price and functionality. I was therefore expecting a similar range of products that you might find in a high end 8 or 16 bit device, with some blurring towards the middle range of 16 bitters perhaps. There are many applications, like mine, that simply require a little raw processing speed, at the lowest power possible. But to even approach the peripheral mix available on a medium to high end 8 or 16 bit device you have to lurch into the higher end of the LPC range. To me this seems like a gaping hole in the product line. Al Rod Moffitt wrote: > > And I complained to Philips that they'd wasted too much silicon on RAM, > > and Flash. Mind you I don't use RTOS, or HLL, or TCP/IP. I'd be happy > > with 16K flash and 4k RAM. I only want 32 bits for sheer processing > > speed. I can't do what I want an 8 bit device or a 16 bit device at the > > current consumption I need. Everybody wants different things. The > > ADuC702x series from Analog devices looks like a much better balanced > > family of parts to me, although I am still trialling the LPC. > > And might I say 'thanks!' to Philips for not listening to you! ;) > > I for one am rather excited about the new LPC23XX chips, not only because > of the (apparent) on-board 10/100 PHY (not just the MAC, parts which lack > a PHY make it a PITA since you now need another chip and more sharp-edge > traces), yet also the (hopefully) larger RAM (most powerful LPC yet huh?)! > > We have a design that has been working for months now using a bit-banged > CS8900A off of a LPC2106, using LWIP and an in-house RTOS. 60KB/20KB > Flash/RAM is all that we need for the basics (multi-threading, telnet, > httpd, cli, newlib, etc.), however the more RAM, the better the buffering > and therefore higher the performance AND more importantly, the more > applications we can handle. So, Philips, please keep on doing what you do > best and add more peripherals and please more on-board RAM! > > - Rod > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > ADVERTISEMENT > <http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=129912o2g/M=298184.6018725.7038619.3001176/D=groups/S=1706554205:HM/EXP=1111068487/A=2593423/R=0/SIG=11el9gslf/*http://www.netflix.com/Default?mqso=60190075> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Yahoo! Groups Links > > * To visit your group on the web, go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lpc2000/ > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > lpc2000-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:lpc2000-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>. > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.3 - Release Date: 15/03/2005 > >
Message
Re: [lpc2000] Re: LPC23xx ethernet
2005-03-16 by Onestone
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.