Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Message

Re: [lpc2000] Re: LPC23xx ethernet

2005-03-16 by Onestone

Ah but I don't begrudge you your behemoths. I just think my end of the 
bar should be catered for too. When I attended the Philips seminar they 
actually stressed that they felt the market between 8 bitters and 32 
bitters was closing, both in price and functionality. I was therefore 
expecting a similar range of products that you might find in a high end 
8 or 16 bit device, with some blurring towards the middle range of 16 
bitters perhaps. There are many applications, like mine, that simply 
require a little raw processing speed, at the lowest power possible. But 
to even approach the peripheral mix available on a medium to high end 8 
or 16 bit device you have to lurch into the higher end of the LPC range. 
To me this seems like a gaping hole in the product line.

Al

Rod Moffitt wrote:

> > And I complained to Philips that they'd wasted too much silicon on RAM,
> > and Flash. Mind you I don't use RTOS, or HLL, or TCP/IP. I'd be happy
> > with 16K flash and 4k RAM. I only want 32 bits for sheer processing
> > speed. I can't do what I want an 8 bit device or a 16 bit device at the
> > current consumption I need. Everybody wants different things. The
> > ADuC702x series from Analog devices looks like a much better balanced
> > family of parts to me, although I am still trialling the LPC.
>
> And might I say 'thanks!' to Philips for not listening to you! ;)
>
> I for one am rather excited about the new LPC23XX chips, not only because
> of the (apparent) on-board 10/100 PHY (not just the MAC, parts which lack
> a PHY make it a PITA since you now need another chip and more sharp-edge
> traces), yet also the (hopefully) larger RAM (most powerful LPC yet huh?)!
>
> We have a design that has been working for months now using a bit-banged
> CS8900A off of a LPC2106, using LWIP and an in-house RTOS. 60KB/20KB
> Flash/RAM is all that we need for the basics (multi-threading, telnet,
> httpd, cli, newlib, etc.), however the more RAM, the better the buffering
> and therefore higher the performance AND more importantly, the more
> applications we can handle. So, Philips, please keep on doing what you do
> best and add more peripherals and please more on-board RAM!
>
> - Rod
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
> <http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=129912o2g/M=298184.6018725.7038619.3001176/D=groups/S=1706554205:HM/EXP=1111068487/A=2593423/R=0/SIG=11el9gslf/*http://www.netflix.com/Default?mqso=60190075> 
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>     * To visit your group on the web, go to:
>       http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lpc2000/
>        
>     * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>       lpc2000-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>       <mailto:lpc2000-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>        
>     * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
>       Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.3 - Release Date: 15/03/2005
>  
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.