Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Message

Re: [lpc2000] LPC2138: Ram vs Flash code execution

2005-03-24 by k b shah (lascaux)

It is a fact that the access from internal flash is slower then internal RAM, that is the reasn they have MAM setting.... it actually caches the instructions and execute from the cache, which results in faster execution. there are three different settings .. 
MAM -- off  --- slowest 
MAM  -- partially on -- Execution time more predictable 
MAM -- full on... best executin time.
kb
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Marko Pavlin (home) 
  To: lpc2000@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 12:49 PM
  Subject: Re: [lpc2000] LPC2138: Ram vs Flash code execution


  Runing from RAM runs at Cclk. Flash has 60ns access time, which is 3x 
  slower at 60MHz. Are you using MAM?

  Lowry, Jeff wrote:

  > Code running from internal RAM seems to run about 4x faster than running
  > from internal Flash. Is this true or do I have some settings wrong?
  > Anybody know where I can find fetch timings for Ram vs Flash code
  > execution?  Thanks, Jeff.



        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
              ADVERTISEMENT
             
       
       


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Yahoo! Groups Links

    a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lpc2000/
      
    b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    lpc2000-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      
    c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.