Lpc2000

Hello Joe,

I created a folder in the files section "LPC2148".  In here is a pdf 
file showing a preliminary pinout for the LPC2148.  This was given 
to me by a Philips rep. via may local distributor, so you might want 
to double check with Philips before using it.

I requested it because I am using an LPC2138, and I am leaving the 
option to add USB to may board much as you are doing.  Since I am 
working on a prototype which will not be in production for some 
time, I'm not too worried about using the preliminary pinout.

Jeff W


--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Joe" <nospam1234@y...> wrote:
> 
> Bump
> 
> My timing was a little off before ;-)
> I now have over half the layout done, and have jumper options for
> the 2129/2138.
> 
> I repeat my plea
> 
> IS THERE ANY CHANCE OF AT LEAST POSTING A PRELIMINARY
> (SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
> PIN DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE LPC213x/LPC214x.
> 
> If Slide7.jpg in the file section is correct and  the 214x with 
USB is
> to be sampling in  "H1 '05" you must have some idea of how the 
pinout
> will be affected ;-)
> 
> It would also be nice to know when the LPC2138 will be available in
> production, the layout includes a 1.8V regulator and both CAN and
> secondary I2C processor to processor communications hardware, 
because
> I can not presently order 2138 from distribution.
> 
> Thanks in advance
> 
> Joe Bougher
> Bioanalytical Systems Inc.
> 2701 Kent Av. 
> West Lafayette IN 47906
> (765) 463-4527
> 
> 
> --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Joe" <nospam1234@y...> wrote:
> > 
> > Philips-Apps 
> > 
> >  I know Philips does not like to post information before the 
product
> > is real. 
> >  
> >  However I have to do a PCB layout in the next week or 2 of a
> LPC2138
> > and would REALLY like to anticipate changing over to the LPC2148
> when
> > it is available.  
> > 
> >  Is there any chance of at least posting a preliminary (subject 
to
> > change) pin difference between the LPC213x/LPC214x.
> > 
> >  I am currently using USBN9604 on the SPI port for USB, and it is
> slow
> > and inefficient.
> > 
> > Thank in advance.
> > 
> > Joe