Lpc2000

Hello Roger,

> A. The KEIL benchmark used LPC2294 in their *simulator* to obtain
> those published values.
> B. Thiadmer's paper describes benchmarking of a *real* LPC2106
> system.
> 
> To acknowledge the difference, and then to proceed with the testing
> - puzzles me (see quote below).

Good point. Based on the claim that the KEIL simulator is "cycle
accurate" and the LPC2294 and LPC2106 using the same ARM7TDMI core, I
*assumed* the results would be comparable. Obviously, I should have
verified my assumptions. I intend to update my article with any new
insight (but I must ask for some patience...).

Thank you for your comment, and kind regards,
Thiadmer