Lpc2000

At 06:54 PM 5/15/05 +0000, roger_lynx wrote:
>--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Robert Adsett <subscriptions@a...>
>wrote:
> > At 10:57 AM 5/15/05 +0100, Jane Highland wrote:
> > >Charles and co,
> >
> > I'm going to try to take some time to respond to this since I think
>it
> > deserves a thoughtful response and I don't wish this to degenerate
>into a
> > flame war.
>
>[deleted]
>
> > BTW, how have you
> > integrated lint with your IDE?  Most of the compiler included IDEs
>I've
> > seen don't have very good provision for that, much less for various
>code
> > generators.
>
>KEIL's uVision3 has *lint* provision, [and CVS as well].
>
>BTW, I do not work for KEIL.
>
>*Objectivity* made me write this observation.
>:-)

Ahh, good to see some do.  Does it support 3'rd part code generators as 
well?  The one compiler included IDE I knew that got all of this 'right' 
(that obviously being a rather subjective term ;) was Tasking, which used 
an OEM version of Codewright.  They, unfortunately, dongled their compiler 
a few years ago.  I had to buy a version of one of their compilers 
recently, unfortunately still dongled although they have eased up on it a 
bit.  They are still shipping an OEM version of Codewright.

Robert


" 'Freedom' has no meaning of itself.  There are always restrictions,   be 
they legal, genetic, or physical.  If you don't believe me, try to chew a 
radio signal. "  -- Kelvin Throop, III
http://www.aeolusdevelopment.com/