Alaric B Snell wrote: > I'm planning on making a stab at gForth, although I haven't looked too > deeply into feasability yet! But where gcc can go, gforth can generally > follow, if not with all the platform-specific speed tricks. gForth is nice but I think pForth is worth considering too for ease of portability and compactness: http://www.softsynth.com/pforth/ Also worth a look is Andrew Mileski's SAForth written in GNU format assembly for the StrongARM 110- perhaps a bit more work to port but probably faster and definitely smaller than a C-based Forth: http://netwinder.oregonstate.edu/devteam/andrewm/forth/strongarm/saforth-0.12.tar.gz I should point out that I'm in no way a Forth expert. > Bwah! Are you one of the many former Alexes of (void)? Who Lee Maguire > and I did meet? For indeed, I used to be called Alaric B. Williams, and That's right :) -- ------------ Alex Holden - http://www.linuxhacker.org ------------ If it doesn't work, you're not hitting it with a big enough hammer
Message
Re: [lpc2100] LPC-M216 DIL module PCBs
2004-01-30 by Alex Holden
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.