Lpc2000

Alex Holden wrote:
> Alaric B Snell wrote:
> 
>>I'm planning on making a stab at gForth, although I haven't looked too 
>>deeply into feasability yet! But where gcc can go, gforth can generally 
>>follow, if not with all the platform-specific speed tricks.
> 
> 
> gForth is nice but I think pForth is worth considering too for ease of 
> portability and compactness:
> http://www.softsynth.com/pforth/

I'll take a look, thanks!

> Also worth a look is Andrew Mileski's SAForth written in GNU format 
> assembly for the StrongARM 110- perhaps a bit more work to port but 
> probably faster and definitely smaller than a C-based Forth:
> http://netwinder.oregonstate.edu/devteam/andrewm/forth/strongarm/saforth-0.12.tar.gz

Mmmm, that might be good... more effort though. Perhaps for version 2.

Either way, when I'm done I'll post [a link to] my port here.

ABS