--- In lpc2100@yahoogroups.com, "Brian C. Lane" <brian@s...> wrote: > Leon Heller wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "martin de lange" <martin_de_lange@x...> > > To: <lpc2100@yahoogroups.com> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 8:23 AM > > Subject: Re: [lpc2100] JTAG port > > > > > > > >>Do you mean that one would sometimes use the one JTAG port and at other > >>times use the other accoording to which I/O you wanted to use ? > > > > > > Yes, it's mentioned in the data sheet. > > > > > >>I have also seen at times that users at times cannot get the second port > > > > to > > > >>work for debug and or flashing. > > > > > > I think that Philips has stated that the second JTAG port cannot be used for > > programming, only debug. > > > > Where? That's a pretty important piece of info. If that's the case then > this part isn't as useful as it looks at first glance. If you need the > primary JTAG for debug and programming then you lose those pins and the > trace pins (from my understanding). > > Sharing JTAG pins with I/O is an understandable practice from the > manufacturer's standpoint, but from mine it makes designing things alot > more difficult -- its pretty hard to assign any useful function to the > pins that are used by the JTAG. You're almost better off programming it > via the serial port and using 1-line diagnostics to debug like you have > to do on the PIC <G>. > > Brian > > Hi Brian ! And how about programming it using the serial port and debugging with the secondary JTAG ? It is possible? Juanjo
Message
Re: JTAG port
2004-02-03 by geimble
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.