Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Message

Re: JTAG port

2004-02-03 by lpc2100_fan

--- In lpc2100@yahoogroups.com, Ben Dooks <ben@f...> wrote:

> one has to wonder in the days of high density packing why giving
> 4-5 pins a special function is so abhorent to these manufacturers.
> 
> -- 
> Ben
> 
> Q:      What's a light-year?
> A:      One-third less calories than a regular year.

Hi Ben,

what about looking at it like this. JTAG pins are dedicated pins, no
secondary function. You need more than the available I/O pins? Well
that's probably exactly what other customers told Philips as well. Now
assuming the same number of I/O pins but 5 dedicated JTAG pins leaves
us with a 53-pin package;-)
Seriously, every pins is money and increases the size of the package.
I consider the dual functionality a compromise for those of us who
actually need the small package, more I/O AND JTAG. You or anybody
else should feel free to use (probably the secondary) JTAG as
dedicated pins.
Btw. the 64-pin device LPC2114... has more I/O pins and you can use
the JTAG pins dedicated.

Cheers, Bob

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.