Lpc2000

Clyde, 

> On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 07:59:06AM +0200, 42Bastian Schick wrote:
> > I read the manual now, but still I think 0x3e+2 must be 
> compiled and 
> > give 0x40.
> 
> I disagree with the GCC implementers on this, but nonetheless 
> a strict interpretation of the ANSI/ISO standard for C does 
> mean that 0x3e+2 is parsed as an invalid floating point 
> number. My view is that a more intelligent interpretation 
> would be preferable, but that's not what GCC does.

Even under C90, 0x3e+2 is a good preprocessing number but a bad C
floating point literal and *must* be reported as an error!

--
Paul Curtis, Rowley Associates Ltd  http://www.rowley.co.uk
CrossWorks for MSP430, ARM, AVR and now MAXQ processors