--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "javida13" <javida13@y...> wrote: > I have found two possible devices: > Philips PCA9555 (16-bits with pull-ups) > Microchip MCP23016 (16-bits w/o pull-ups) > MCP23008 (8-bits w/o pull-ups) When designed a product initially using the MCP23016, but we switched to the PCA9555 late in the design phase (delaying the production with a month). This decision was taken due to two problems with the MCP23016, one of which could not be resolved. 1. We have found that the MCP23016 does not follow the I2C protocol specification precisely; we needed to add a few short delays in our implementation of the I2C protocol (which should be redundant). 2. We have found that five of the 16 pins, when configured as outputs, may occasionaly exhibit a "bounce" when switching from low level to high level, or vice versa. These bounces occur approximately 10 us after the level change and have a duration for about 80 us. We could not find a solution for this problem. Microchip suggested that we use the MCP23017. However, this took more redesign of the PCB than switching to PCA9555. (This also allowed us to remove the redundant delays and speed up the I2C protocol.) A side note: the pull-ups on the PCA9555 are "weak pull-ups". Thiadmer
Message
Re: Port Expander
2005-09-12 by Thiadmer Riemersma (ITB CompuPhase)
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.