Hi Charles, >If you only need to store small amounts of data (or even large amounts with >a simple append or save-over policy) then a full-blown file system is >overkill. I agree >If you need to share the media (eg. CF or SD) with a PC, then you'll >probably want FAT. There is no other alternative...AFAIK >FAT is, however, rather unreliable. Log structured file systems designed >for flash (eg. JFFS2 or YAFFS) are far more reliable. I disagree strongly... I have written my own FAT16 driver which I used prior to using the PRLLC source code solution and I've never toasted the files so badly that scandisk couldn't save them, and thinking about the many megabytes I have written to both secure digital and compact flash cards I think it's a nice statistic. >#disclaimer. I wrote YAFFS and have been kicked in the ***** by FAT too >many times. What where your problems? Regards Lasse Madsen Yahoo! Groups Links
Message
RE: [lpc2000] Flash File System?
2005-09-20 by Lasse Madsen
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.