here's a part of code :
typedef struct
{
uint8_t bsjmpBoot[3];
char bsOEMName[8];
uint16_t bsBytesPerSec;
...
}BootSector;
and a buffer FAT16_buffer[512] where I put data frome SD card in.
for example , if I declare a Bootsector struct at same address of
FAT16_Buffer, and read the first sector of my SDcard, I coul read
directly the field of my struct.
bsjmpBoot is 3 bytes and is OK
BsOEMName is 8 bytes and OK
bsByteBytesPerSec is 2 bytes is not OK because bsOEMBoot+bsOEMName =
11 bytes : 1 bytes is 'filled' between bsOEMName and bsBytesPerSec.
So data becomes buggy.
with the #pramga pack (x) , Can I 'byte align' each field of my struct ?
--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Angel Sanchez" <angelsp@a...> wrote:
> In a similar situation I use:
>
> #pragma pack (2)
>
> ...
> Structures, etc
>
> #pragma pack ()
>
> and this work (align at word boundaries)
>
> Regards
> Angel Sanchez
>
>
> --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "nourson54" <nourson54@y...> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm trying a fat16 library that use an union for storing the
> > bootsector data, and it seems the compiler doesn't handle correctly
> > the width of types in memory.
> > So I searched some help on crossworks (gcc) compiler and found that
> I
> > have to use this attribute with my concerned unions :
> > __attribute__ ((__packed__))
> >
> > But if the compiler doesn't shout at me when compiling , it seems it
> > has no effect : my union is badly aligned.
> >
> > Have any idea ?Message
Re: Struct/Union alignement problem with Crossworks
2005-09-20 by nourson54
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.