> I guess you could do that, but that would add extra overhead to the > SWI calls. > > AFAIK, the problem only applies to a few encodings of ldm/stm that you > don't use in normal use anyway. Therefore I don't see much need to > jump through hoops to accomodate it. Thats what I am trying to determine. > For calling APCS compilant (ie. C generated isrs) you do not have to > save all registers, only r0..r3. The called function will save any > other registers it needs itself. Right, but if you are running an RTOS, then the C generated ISR code is insufficient, since a context switch may occur as a consequence of the interrupt. So in uCOS-II you need to save all processor context, service the interrupts, and then restore to the highest priority task. Since you basically have to store all registers, it would seem that the ldm/stm instructions would be the desired ones to use. Dave
Message
RE: [lpc2000] Re: ARM_UCOS port and the use of stmfd/ldmfd
2005-09-21 by David Hawkins
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.