One thing I find troublesome about the Atmel AT91SAM7Sxx: There is no guaranteed external Reset pin. If URSTEN in RSTC_MR is set to 0, asserting NRST will not generate a reset. Hence, I cannot have a hardware reset button which will guarantee recovery from any type of possible catastrophic software crash (unless I want to actualy remove power from the chip). --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Eric Engler" <englere.geo@y...> wrote: > This is the best comparison I've seen of these popular families. I > didn't see you mention Ethernet but maybe that's not a concern for you. > > The AT91SAM7X256 should be out by now and that looks great - you might > want to look at it. > > One issue that concerns me: there's an open source downloader to > program flash on Philips devices, but nothing like that exists for the > Atmel devices yet. As I understand it (someone correct me if I'm > wrong), there's no linux downloader (of any kind) for SAM-BA, and > there's no commandline downloader for Windows. > > Commandline downloaders are convenient to use with various IDEs that > don't have built-in JTAG support. An open source downloader gives us > IDE authors a good example of how to integrate support for it into > IDEs. > > I didn't check to see if Atmel fully documented the SAM-BA API, but it > seems like its closed. They also didn't seem to publish the API for > their DLL either. Or maybe this stuff is documented somewhere, or > maybe it will be soon. Atmel seems like a fairly open company so I'm a > little confused about this. > > However, it's also fair to point out that Philips does not support > programming flash over USB at all (you could roll your own code, of > course). but Atmel does (if you can make use of their Windows GUI > program). > > Eric
Message
Re: LPC214x or AT91SAM7Sxx?
2005-09-26 by lp2000c
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.