Lpc2000

Yes probably am - working from memory, and I was probably relying on
default 4K cluster size on many disks.

It may make sense to align cluster size w/flash erase block size.

Bill W.
San Jose 


--- In lpc2000@...m, "donhamilton2002" <hamilton@d...> wrote:
>
> --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "wmwiese" <wmwiese@y...> wrote:
> 
> > As I recall, FAT32 disk partitions need a minimum 'disk' size of 260MB
> > (that's MEGAbytes).  The old FAT12 is good for 'disks' up to about
> > 16MB;  I believe FAT16 is good for 16MB to around 2GB. 
> > 
> 
> This is one of those posts that I have to say something.
> 
> Bill you are wrong about your statments above.
> 
> I am not interested in educating the masses, but this is just wrong.
> 
> hamilton
>