Lpc2000

There is nothing critical with any of the parts in this regard. This was 
simply a side note to say that I thought I had a problem but it wasn't 
really. All I had to do was to not assume that R0,R1 would not be 
changed, as simple as that. Your code may access the IAP differently but 
mine needed to access the result from the buffer and so was assuming 
that R0 still pointed to that buffer. In my instance I simply reloaded 
R0 and the 2138's IAP works like a breeze now.

Hope that clarifies the previous remark I made.

*Peter*

hyperikon wrote:
> so, you would not suggest to take the 2138 for IAP Programming? I 
> wanted to use the 2138 because of its big flash memory. Which parts 
> of the lpc2000 family are uncritical for IAP Programming?
>   

<n.b. please trim your quotes>