At 02:59 PM 10/28/2005, Paul Curtis wrote: >Richard, > > > I didn't think they list the sales price? > >$4.6M. That's not a high valuation, unless there is something else. >We'll see when the accounts come out. Hmmm... I thought it says combined gross asset of $4.6M, not that they pay $4.6M. Paying $4.6M seems awfully low. I think the conventional wisdom is 3-5x of annual sales... > > Wow, may be we will do a 8051 > > compiler after all. This may create a vacuum on the 8051/C16x > > toolchain space... > >Why? ARM said they'll keep 8051 and C166 compilers on the go. Sure..... and you believe that? Lets says it lasts for 2-3 years, then what? > > See Paul, if only you have done a Thumb-2 compiler, they > > might have bought you! :-) > >I don't believe so. I don't think they wanted *another* compiler. Put >it this way, ARM have had a gig with Metrowerks and did the CodeWarrior >thing to get an IDE, but now Metrowerks seems to be pulling out of the >ARM game. Then ARM bought in the RealView stuff (forget who they >purchased that from) to replace the old ARM debugger. They know their >IDE is a bit crufty and needs a refresh, so perhaps that's why they >purchased Keil? From a distance, it just seems ARM's tool strategy is >all bits and pieces. No sh*t :-) // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please use richard at imagecraft.com)
Message
RE: [lpc2000] Keil
2005-10-28 by Richard
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.