Lpc2000

I just wanted to add that the small "concept" bug does not affect the 
results of the test at all; it only affects the ability of the 
processor of returning to normal state with just an interrupt.

Guille

--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Guillermo Prandi" 
<yahoo.messenger@m...> wrote:
>
> Hi, I just wanted to point out that there seems to be small bug in 
> the test code shown in the PDF:
> 
> switch(c) {
> case 'b': PCON=1;
> case 'c': PCON=1;
> case 'd': UartOff();PCON=6;
> case 'e': PCON=2;
> case 'f': PCON=6;
> }
> 
> should probably have been:
> 
> switch(c) {
> case 'b': PCON=1; break;
> case 'c': PCON=1; break;
> case 'd': UartOff();PCON=6; break;
> case 'e': PCON=2; break;
> case 'f': PCON=6; break;
> }
> 
> Guille
>