Hi rtstofer Are you serious? For 99.99 I would by the Keil immeadetly. Cheers Michael >From: "rtstofer" <rstofer@...> >Reply-To: lpc2000@yahoogroups.com >To: lpc2000@yahoogroups.com >Subject: [lpc2000] Re: ARM buys Keil >Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 00:40:13 -0000 > >--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Curtis" <plc@r...> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > I think it more likely to be the other way around. I > > > envision a scenario where, if you want to use the ARM core > > > efficiently, you HAVE to buy their compiler. > > > > That's nonsense--why else do 3Ps exist if not to compete with ARM's > > compiler? I reckon IAR and Green Hills, and probably others, would > > vehemently defend their position as worthy competitors to ARM's >tools. > > I choose those two simply because their prices are comparable with >ARM's > > pricing model. > >Because ARM makes money on the IP. They can price the compiler in >such a way that all of the competition dies. There would be two >platforms - open source GNU and ARM/Keil. At $99.95 even I would >buy the package! > >It will be fun to watch but I don't have a business or financial >interest in how it shakes out. This is just a hobby; it's hard to >take it serious. > > > >
Message
RE: [lpc2000] Re: ARM buys Keil
2005-10-31 by Michael Rubitschka
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.