Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Message

RE: [lpc2000] Re: ARM buys Keil

2005-10-31 by Michael Rubitschka

Hi rtstofer

Are you serious?
For 99.99 I would by the Keil immeadetly.

Cheers
Michael


>From: "rtstofer" <rstofer@...>
>Reply-To: lpc2000@yahoogroups.com
>To: lpc2000@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [lpc2000] Re: ARM buys Keil
>Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 00:40:13 -0000
>
>--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Curtis" <plc@r...> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > I think it more likely to be the other way around.  I
> > > envision a scenario where, if you want to use the ARM core
> > > efficiently, you HAVE to buy their compiler.
> >
> > That's nonsense--why else do 3Ps exist if not to compete with ARM's
> > compiler?  I reckon IAR and Green Hills, and probably others, would
> > vehemently defend their position as worthy competitors to ARM's
>tools.
> > I choose those two simply because their prices are comparable with
>ARM's
> > pricing model.
>
>Because ARM makes money on the IP.  They can price the compiler in
>such a way that all of the competition dies.  There would be two
>platforms - open source GNU and ARM/Keil.  At $99.95 even I would
>buy the package!
>
>It will be fun to watch but I don't have a business or financial
>interest in how it shakes out.  This is just a hobby; it's hard to
>take it serious.
>
>
>
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.