Could you post or send me this pdf document please??
--- Guillermo Prandi
<yahoo.messenger@...> wrote:
> It seems I keep embarrasing myself... The code was
> never intended to
> wake up the processor on interrupt.
>
> for(;;);
>
> Never mind my mouth. Sorry for all the buzz...
>
> Guille
>
> --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Guillermo Prandi"
> <yahoo.messenger@m...> wrote:
> >
> > I just wanted to add that the small "concept" bug
> does not affect
> the
> > results of the test at all; it only affects the
> ability of the
> > processor of returning to normal state with just
> an interrupt.
> >
> > Guille
> >
> > --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Guillermo Prandi"
>
> > <yahoo.messenger@m...> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi, I just wanted to point out that there seems
> to be small bug
> in
> > > the test code shown in the PDF:
> > >
> > > switch(c) {
> > > case 'b': PCON=1;
> > > case 'c': PCON=1;
> > > case 'd': UartOff();PCON=6;
> > > case 'e': PCON=2;
> > > case 'f': PCON=6;
> > > }
> > >
> > > should probably have been:
> > >
> > > switch(c) {
> > > case 'b': PCON=1; break;
> > > case 'c': PCON=1; break;
> > > case 'd': UartOff();PCON=6; break;
> > > case 'e': PCON=2; break;
> > > case 'f': PCON=6; break;
> > > }
> > >
> > > Guille
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
__________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hsMessage
Re: [lpc2000] Re: LPC213xpower.pdf by Owen Mooney
2005-10-31 by Mukadder Ceyhan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.