Lpc2000

Mukadder, the file is right at the files section:

http://f2.grp.yahoofs.com/v1/ALBmQwa9_kvKfAt5HjPsDrZjdT1SNwA_69FkDNrCL
nSJcfIXPBD5ZP-9j0T9DWhp6qbj5824JjH2eeKe0JyctFYsZs7KhQZmYKml-
Yhd/LPC213xpower.pdf

Guille

--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Mukadder Ceyhan <mukadder_c@y...> 
wrote:
>
> Could you post or send me this pdf document please??
> 
> --- Guillermo Prandi
> <yahoo.messenger@m...> wrote:
> 
> > It seems I keep embarrasing myself... The code was
> > never intended to 
> > wake up the processor on interrupt.
> > 
> > for(;;);
> > 
> > Never mind my mouth. Sorry for all the buzz...
> > 
> > Guille
> > 
> > --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Guillermo Prandi" 
> > <yahoo.messenger@m...> wrote:
> > >
> > > I just wanted to add that the small "concept" bug
> > does not affect 
> > the 
> > > results of the test at all; it only affects the
> > ability of the 
> > > processor of returning to normal state with just
> > an interrupt.
> > > 
> > > Guille
> > > 
> > > --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Guillermo Prandi"
> > 
> > > <yahoo.messenger@m...> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi, I just wanted to point out that there seems
> > to be small bug 
> > in 
> > > > the test code shown in the PDF:
> > > > 
> > > > switch(c) {
> > > > case 'b': PCON=1;
> > > > case 'c': PCON=1;
> > > > case 'd': UartOff();PCON=6;
> > > > case 'e': PCON=2;
> > > > case 'f': PCON=6;
> > > > }
> > > > 
> > > > should probably have been:
> > > > 
> > > > switch(c) {
> > > > case 'b': PCON=1; break;
> > > > case 'c': PCON=1; break;
> > > > case 'd': UartOff();PCON=6; break;
> > > > case 'e': PCON=2; break;
> > > > case 'f': PCON=6; break;
> > > > }
> > > > 
> > > > Guille
> > > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 		
> __________________________________ 
> Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page! 
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>