derbaier wrote: >The 32KHz "tuning fork" crystals used in watches and microcontroller >sleep circuits have a maximum drive rating. IIRC it is on the order >of 5 microwatts or less. The resistor is not intended to have any >direct effect on the frequency of oscillation, although it does tend >to suppress any overtone oscillation tendancy. The purpose of the >resistor is to prevent overdriving the crystal. If the crystal is >overdriven it's frequency accuracy will degrade over time at a rate >much faster than it is specified for. In extreme cases it could >actually crack, but that is not likely with a low voltage CMOS >oscillator. In cell phone ASICs we always designed the crystal power >limiting resistance internal to the ASIC itself. I wonder what Keil >found out concerning the crystal drive circuit in the 2130? > > > Either that, or their designer has had problems with excessive heating of the crystals in past designs and simply carried over a tried-n-true solution. I did not consider that the colpitts circuit would do that, overheat the crystal, but I guess it is possible. You always learn something new. ;-) I'll have to look at the specs to see if over-driving the crystal may indeed be a potential problem... TomW -- Tom Walsh - WN3L - Embedded Systems Consultant http://openhardware.net, http://cyberiansoftware.com "Windows? No thanks, I have work to do..." ----------------------------------------------------
Message
Re: [lpc2000] Re: KEIL MCB2130 RTC clock question
2005-11-03 by Tom Walsh
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.