Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Thread

ULINK 10 X 0 ME

ULINK 10 X 0 ME

2004-05-24 by Rodrigo

I'm almost 1 month with a ULINK, and I couldn't debug my code yet...
The two Blinky examples debug. I'm using the Startup.s and Flash.ld
files from Blinky IRQ, cause I use timer 0 interrupt.I can load the my
code and run, but when I try to debug I receive the MEMORY MISMATCH
error. I know that the MCB2100 settings are correct, cause the Blinky
examples debug...Do I need to change the Startup.s or Flash.ld files in
order to debug my code? I really don't know what's wrong with my code...

> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: lpc2000@yahoogroups.com [mailto:lpc2000@yahoogroups.com]
> Enviada em: segunda-feira, 24 de maio de 2004 15:11
> Para: lpc2000@yahoogroups.com
> Assunto: [lpc2000] Digest Number 193
> 
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> 
> There are 16 messages in this issue.
> 
> Topics in this digest:
> 
>       1. New file uploaded to lpc2000
>            From: lpc2000
>       2. Re: SOT313-2 / LQFP48 footprint
>            From: "Chetan Bhargava" <list1@...>
>       3. RE: USB 2.0 with NET2270 / NET2272 and LPC2000 ?
>            From: "Curt Powell" <curt.powell@...>
>       4. Mail Delivery System
>            From: mcarioti@...
>       5. Re: USB 2.0 with NET2270 / NET2272 and LPC2000 ?
>            From: "Shannon Holland" <holland@...>
>       6. Re: Flash fails to write a bit or zeroes other bit
>            From: "chazeltopman" <rob@...>
>       7. v1.2 CrossWorks for ARM released
>            From: "Michael Johnson" <mpj@...>
>       8. Re: Flash fails to write a bit or zeroes other bit
>            From: "chazeltopman" <rob@...>
>       9. LPC 2212/14 Development Board
>            From: "Srinath" <srinath.ananthaswamy@...>
>      10. Sample ISR setup code for GCC?(Newbie)
>            From: "Richard" <embeddedc@...>
>      11. Re: Sample ISR setup code for GCC?(Newbie)
>            From: "Karl Olsen" <kro@...>
>      12. Re: LPC 2212/14 Development Board
>            From: Robert Adsett <subscriptions@...>
>      13. Re: LPC 2212/14 Development Board
>            From: Robert Adsett <subscriptions@...>
>      14. interrupt vector table & IAP
>            From: "more_effective" <wolfish@...>
>      15. SWI Software Interrupt
>            From: "Rob R" <rob@...>
>      16. Re: interrupt vector table & IAP
>            From: MaxStream - Ryan Bedwell <ryanb@...>
> 
> 
>
________________________________________________________________________
>
________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Message: 1
>    Date: 23 May 2004 22:33:31 -0000
>    From: lpc2000
> Subject: New file uploaded to lpc2000
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> This email message is a notification to let you know that
> a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the lpc2000
> group.
> 
>   File        : /LPC2100-protel-sch-footprint.zip
>   Uploaded by : cbhargava <list1@...>
>   Description : Protel 99SE device (sch) and footprint (PCB)
> 
> You can access this file at the URL
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lpc2000/files/LPC2100-protel-sch-
> footprint.zip
> 
> To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit
> 
> http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files
> 
> Regards,
> 
> cbhargava <list1@...>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
________________________________________________________________________
>
________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Message: 2
>    Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 22:45:59 -0000
>    From: "Chetan Bhargava" <list1@...>
> Subject: Re: SOT313-2 / LQFP48 footprint
> 
> Thanks Leon,
> 
> I have created a device for schematic and LQFP48 pcb footprint. I
> have uploaded a zip file containing the library.
> 
> -Chetan Bhargava
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
________________________________________________________________________
>
________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Message: 3
>    Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 21:07:08 -0700
>    From: "Curt Powell" <curt.powell@...>
> Subject: RE: USB 2.0 with NET2270 / NET2272 and LPC2000 ?
> 
> Martin,
> 
> I've worked with the Cypress family of chips- EZ-USB, FX, FX2, and SX2
> (stay away from the SX2).  Don't have any experience with NetChip.
> Charles Manning on this list has worked with the ftdi chip.  With any
of
> these chips you'll probably be limited by the lpc gpio speed, assuming
> you're using gpio to interface with the USB chip, to a few megabytes
per
> second bulk throughput.
> 
> I recall seeing announcements of other ARM-based chips with on-board
USB
> and in the last week or so there was a rumour posted about a future
> "LPC2130" with on-board USB.
> 
> Curt
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: capiman@... [mailto:capiman@...]
> Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 2:19 AM
> To: lpc2000@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [lpc2000] USB 2.0 with NET2270 / NET2272 and LPC2000 ?
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> has someone used one of NetChip's USB 2.0 controller with LPC2000
series
> (or
> any other uC) ?
> Is it working without problems ? What bandwidth can i reach in reality
?
> What is the rough price of these chips ?
> 
> Regards,
> 
>          Martin
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
________________________________________________________________________
>
________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Message: 4
>    Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 12:29:02 +0800
>    From: mcarioti@...
> Subject: Mail Delivery System
> 
> The message contains Unicode characters and has been sent as a binary
> attachment.
> 
> 
> 
> [This message contained attachments]
> 
> 
> 
>
________________________________________________________________________
>
________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Message: 5
>    Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 21:30:59 -0700
>    From: "Shannon Holland" <holland@...>
> Subject: Re: USB 2.0 with NET2270 / NET2272 and LPC2000 ?
> 
> There's also the TI TUSB3410 (think that's the right part number)
which is
> 8052 based and communicates with external chips over a UART/GPIO. So
no
> need
> to bitbang a memory bus. Program execution is out of RAM (can either
be
> loaded from the host driver or else a I2C rom).
> 
> Haven't used it yet, but am planning to try it with the 210x in the
next
> week or so.
> 
> Shannon
> 
> On Sun, 23 May 2004 21:07:08 -0700
>   "Curt Powell" <curt.powell@...> wrote:
> >Martin,
> >
> >I've worked with the Cypress family of chips- EZ-USB, FX, FX2, and
SX2
> >(stay away from the SX2).  Don't have any experience with NetChip.
> >Charles Manning on this list has worked with the ftdi chip.  With any
of
> >these chips you'll probably be limited by the lpc gpio speed,
assuming
> >you're using gpio to interface with the USB chip, to a few megabytes
per
> >second bulk throughput.
> >
> >I recall seeing announcements of other ARM-based chips with on-board
USB
> >and in the last week or so there was a rumour posted about a future
> >"LPC2130" with on-board USB.
> >
> >Curt
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: capiman@... [mailto:capiman@...]
> >Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 2:19 AM
> >To: lpc2000@yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: [lpc2000] USB 2.0 with NET2270 / NET2272 and LPC2000 ?
> >
> >
> >Hello,
> >
> >has someone used one of NetChip's USB 2.0 controller with LPC2000
series
> >(or
> >any other uC) ?
> >Is it working without problems ? What bandwidth can i reach in
reality ?
> >What is the rough price of these chips ?
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >         Martin
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
>
________________________________________________________________________
>
________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Message: 6
>    Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 05:40:08 -0000
>    From: "chazeltopman" <rob@...>
> Subject: Re: Flash fails to write a bit or zeroes other bit
> 
> --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "chazeltopman" <rob@n...> wrote:
> >  Now let me explain the write algorithm I'm using.
> >  I need to be able to store 32 bit values into flash
> >  one at a time.  Since the IAP routines limit writes
> >  to a minimum of 512 bytes I  had to work around
> >  this limit.
> 
>  I've received an anonymous reply that addresses the
>  flash writing limitations:
> 
> : The flash can not be used '32 bit word' wise.
> : You could try to write 16 bytes at once (4x 32 bit word),
> : but the number of partial writes per 512 bytes (the normal
> : size) is limited (I don't believe this number is specified).
> :
> : Note the '16 byte'data should be properly aligned on 16 byte
> : multiples (but again the number of 'partial write'is limited
> : .. let's say .. 16 times or so :-) ).
> :
> : You may repost this info in the group - as long as you
> : don't refer to me.
> 
>  Since counting the number of times I write to a location
>  presents a new bag of trouble, I'll use the dumb algorithm
>  of copy, modify, erase and write back.  Sigh.
> 
>  Rob
> 
> 
> 
>
________________________________________________________________________
>
________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Message: 7
>    Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 08:36:03 +0100
>    From: "Michael Johnson" <mpj@...>
> Subject: v1.2 CrossWorks for ARM released
> 
> We've released v1.2 of CrossWorks for ARM - this is available for both
> windows and linux.
> 
> >From an LPC21xx perspective the following applies
> 
>   - memory map files are shipped that describe the registers/memory of
> all the LPC21xx devices.
>   - a processor property to select the memory map by processor name.
>   - support for Segger J-Link (windows only) - as shipped with the
> Philips/IAR kickstart kit.
>   - samples now work on Olimex LPC-P1, Keil MCB2100, Philips/IAR
> kickstart and Nohau LPC210x dev boards.
>   - reset script changes to make flash loading more reliable.
>   - target property to set the clock speed of the flash loader.
>   - support for the gcc 3.3.4 assembly coded arm FP routines.
> 
> Thanks
> Michael
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
________________________________________________________________________
>
________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Message: 8
>    Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 08:35:03 -0000
>    From: "chazeltopman" <rob@...>
> Subject: Re: Flash fails to write a bit or zeroes other bit
> 
> 
> --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "chazeltopman" <rob@n...> wrote:
> >  Now let me explain the write algorithm I'm using.
> >  I need to be able to store 32 bit values into flash
> >  one at a time.  Since the IAP routines limit writes
> >  to a minimum of 512 bytes I  had to work around
> >  this limit.
> 
> I've received an anonymous reply that addresses the
> flash writing limitations:
> 
> : The flash can not be used '32 bit word' wise.
> : You could try to write 16 bytes at once (4x 32 bit word),
> : but the number of partial writes per 512 bytes (the normal
> : size) is limited (I don't believe this number is specified).
> :
> : Note the '16 byte'data should be properly aligned on 16 byte
> : multiples (but again the number of 'partial write'is limited
> : .. let's say .. 16 times or so :-) ).
> :
> : You may repost this info in the group - as long as you
> : don't refer to me.
> 
> Since counting the number of times I write to a location
> presents a new bag of trouble, I'll use the dumb algorithm
> of copy, modify, erase and write back.  Sigh.
> 
>  Although, with a second thought, it might be worth a best-of
>  algorithm which does a:
>   o copy
>   o modify
>   o write
>   o compare
>   o if ok then done
>   o if different then do dumb algorithm
> 
>  The question is, how much should be compared?  If I compare
>  just the surrounding 512 byte section that I am writing to,
>  will the other sections in the 8K sector be affected?  I
>  suspect not.  But if the write fails, then the copied part
>  and the other sections from the flash must be merged to form
>  the new flash sector image.
> 
>  Now what if I didn't have to write 512 bytes?
>  Does the reply suggest that I can use the IAP write command
>  with a value smaller than the stated 512 bytes?  Hmmm... One
>  way to find out is the emperical method.... No.  Only the
>  published values are accepted.  So I tried to write the
>  whole section of 512 bytes multiple times and the most I
>  got was three good writes after an erase but mostly just
>  two.  So overall, I could cut the time in half by only
>  erasing every second write or as above, if they differ.
>  In my testing, I stayed with a 16 byte, aligned, segment.
> 
>  This is my testing with MaxForth V5.2 in interactive
>  hex entry mode:
>   Where: FLERASE will erase an 8K sector containing a given address
>          Z compares SECTOR to flash and prints the differences
>          SECTOR is a 512 byte buffer
>          COM and READY are command/response buffers
>          IAP takes a command buffer and returns it as a result buffer
> 
> 3DC00 FLERASE  OK  ( erase 8K sector )
> Z 3DC00 3DC04 3DC10 3DC14 3DC18  OK  ( buffer has differences )
> A55B SECTOR 10 + !  OK  ( alter some buffer locations )
> FFFFFFFF SECTOR 14 + !  OK
> Z 3DC00 3DC04 3DC10 3DC18  OK  ( less differences )
> 32 READY ! READY IAP ? 33 COM ! COM IAP ? Z 0 0  OK  ( first write is
ok )
> A558 SECTOR 10 + ! Z 3DC10  OK  ( change buffer again )
> 32 READY ! READY IAP ? 33 COM ! COM IAP ? Z 0 0  OK  ( second write is
ok
> )
> FDP @ SECTOR 14 + ! Z 3DC14  OK  ( change buffer again )
> 32 READY ! READY IAP ? 33 COM ! COM IAP ? Z 0 0 3DC18  OK ( third
write
> fails )
> 
>   The third write failed at a location that I wasn't even
>   changing (0x 3DC18).
> 
>   I like the flash on the 6812 where they have two separate flash
>   banks with different write widths.  The smaller one has a write
>   width of 4 bytes so if you need to write 32 bit values in flash
>   you use the smaller flash.  If you can write in large blocks,
>   you use the larger flash.
> 
>  Rob
> 
> 
> 
>
________________________________________________________________________
>
________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Message: 9
>    Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 09:10:23 -0000
>    From: "Srinath" <srinath.ananthaswamy@...>
> Subject: LPC 2212/14 Development Board
> 
> Hi all,
>     I would like to obtain a cheap setup to experiment using the LPC
> 2212/14. Could someone please help me with the following beginner
> queries.
> 
> 
>     1. Where are the development boards for the 2212/14 available
>        a. If so how much would they cost.
> 
>     2. I am planning on using the GNU toolchain (GCC, GDB) for the
> development/debugging.
>        a. Does a tool like the LPC2000 ISP programmer for the device
> exist for a Linux platform
>        b. If I use JTAG to program/debug on the board where do I
> obtain a JTAG adapter and what is the setup for programming/debugging
> using that in Linux.
> 
> 
>  NOTE: I have chosen the LPC 2212/14 over LPC2106 for the sole reason
> that it has an external bus and I can interface devices like an
> external ADC or USB device etc to the microcontroller. I hope my
> understanding is correct.
> 
> Thanks in Advance
> 
> Regards
> 
> Srinath A
> 
> 
> 
>
________________________________________________________________________
>
________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Message: 10
>    Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 10:08:57 -0000
>    From: "Richard" <embeddedc@...>
> Subject: Sample ISR setup code for GCC?(Newbie)
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have used the GNU tools on an AVR, but not before on an ARM.  Does
> anybody have a link to some sample code that setups up an ISR,
> preferable on a timer?  There does not seem to be a file posted.
> 
> I have read the __attribute__((interrupt(IRQ))) part of the GCC
> manual, but this doesn't explain how the IRQ is installed as such.
> 
> Thanks...
> 
> 
> 
>
________________________________________________________________________
>
________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Message: 11
>    Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 13:17:53 -0000
>    From: "Karl Olsen" <kro@...>
> Subject: Re: Sample ISR setup code for GCC?(Newbie)
> 
> --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Richard" <embeddedc@h...> wrote:
> 
> > I have used the GNU tools on an AVR, but not before on an ARM.
> Does
> > anybody have a link to some sample code that setups up an ISR,
> > preferable on a timer?  There does not seem to be a file posted.
> >
> > I have read the __attribute__((interrupt(IRQ))) part of the GCC
> > manual, but this doesn't explain how the IRQ is installed as such.
> 
> Check out the "Philips LPC2100 Blinky IRQ Example" that you can
> download from the File Download Area at http://www.keil.com.
> 
> Karl
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
________________________________________________________________________
>
________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Message: 12
>    Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 09:45:22 -0400
>    From: Robert Adsett <subscriptions@...>
> Subject: Re: LPC 2212/14 Development Board
> 
> At 09:10 AM 5/24/04 +0000, you wrote:
> >        a. Does a tool like the LPC2000 ISP programmer for the device
> >exist for a Linux platform
> 
> See http://www.engelschall.com/~martin/lpc21xx/isp/index.html
> 
> Robert
> 
> " 'Freedom' has no meaning of itself.  There are always restrictions,
> be they legal, genetic, or physical.  If you don't believe me, try to
> chew a radio signal. "
> 
>                          Kelvin Throop, III
> 
> 
> 
>
________________________________________________________________________
>
________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Message: 13
>    Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 09:42:33 -0400
>    From: Robert Adsett <subscriptions@...>
> Subject: Re: LPC 2212/14 Development Board
> 
> At 09:10 AM 5/24/04 +0000, you wrote:
> >  NOTE: I have chosen the LPC 2212/14 over LPC2106 for the sole
reason
> >that it has an external bus and I can interface devices like an
> >external ADC or USB device etc to the microcontroller. I hope my
> >understanding is correct.
> 
> There are certainly USB, A/D and D/A peripherals that do not require a
> parallel address and data bus.  Unless you are planning on using a
> specific
> peripheral that needs the external bus the only other driving force
would
> be if you needed more memory than is provided on chip on the
non-external
> bus chips.
> 
> Robert
> 
> " 'Freedom' has no meaning of itself.  There are always restrictions,
> be they legal, genetic, or physical.  If you don't believe me, try to
> chew a radio signal. "
> 
>                          Kelvin Throop, III
> 
> 
> 
>
________________________________________________________________________
>
________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Message: 14
>    Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 15:52:16 -0000
>    From: "more_effective" <wolfish@...>
> Subject: interrupt vector table & IAP
> 
> Hi everybody,
> We are trying to work with LPC2104 & Keil uVision3.
> 
> If you take LPC2104 user's manual (2 oct 2003) you can read:
> "If user's code is runing from the on-chip RAM and an aplication
> uses
> interrupts, interrupt vectors must be re-mapped to flash
> address 0x0." (from page 70, VIC usage notes)
> 
> BUT, you can also read:
> "The user should either disable interrupts, or ensure that user
> interrupt vectors are active in RAM and that the interrupt handlers
> reside in RAM, before making a flash erase/write IAP call." (from
> page 180, Interrupts during IAP)
> 
> What we don't understand is the expression "ensure that user
> interrupt vectors are active in RAM". Active in RAM? We thought all
> interrupts & exceptions must be active in 0x0 and above (i.e., flash).
> 
> BTW, can we manage to hace two APPs in flash with diferent interrupt
> vector tables?
> 
> Thanks a lot in advance.
> 
> -.-WOLFISH-.-
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
________________________________________________________________________
>
________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Message: 15
>    Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 18:27:23 +0100
>    From: "Rob R" <rob@...>
> Subject: SWI Software Interrupt
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm using Keil & GNU to compile an example program that does simple
GPIO
> manipulation and sends some data through the UART, but for some
reason,
> there is a software interrupt (SWI_Handler??) for no apparent reason.
> 
> This shows in the simulator, and on the board it just freezes.
> 
> I don't know what could be causing this as I've just string together a
> load
> of code that works individually (i.e. tested Uart stuff, tested the
GPIO
> stuff)..
> 
> 
> 
> Just wondered if anyone had any ideas.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Rob
> 
> http://www.robs-projects.com/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [This message contained attachments]
> 
> 
> 
>
________________________________________________________________________
>
________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Message: 16
>    Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 11:44:11 -0600
>    From: MaxStream - Ryan Bedwell <ryanb@...>
> Subject: Re: interrupt vector table & IAP
> 
> more_effective wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> > We are trying to work with LPC2104 & Keil uVision3.
> >
> > If you take LPC2104 user's manual (2 oct 2003) you can read:
> > "If user's code is runing from the on-chip RAM and an aplication
> > uses
> > interrupts, interrupt vectors must be re-mapped to flash
> > address 0x0." (from page 70, VIC usage notes)
> >
> > BUT, you can also read:
> > "The user should either disable interrupts, or ensure that user
> > interrupt vectors are active in RAM and that the interrupt handlers
> > reside in RAM, before making a flash erase/write IAP call." (from
> > page 180, Interrupts during IAP)
> >
> > What we don't understand is the expression "ensure that user
> > interrupt vectors are active in RAM". Active in RAM? We thought all
> > interrupts & exceptions must be active in 0x0 and above (i.e.,
flash).
> 
> Address 0 can appear in one of four places: the base of user flash,
the
> base of user RAM, in external memory (for parts that support this) or
> somewhere in the Philips bootloader.  You have to put your vectors in
> one of the three user locations, then configure the remapping
> appropriately via the MEMMAP register.
> 
> If you're going to call IAP flash erase/write routines with interrupts
> enabled, you would have to have the vectors and the routines in RAM
(or
> external memory) to ensure no access to the flash during the
> erase/program operation.
> 
> > BTW, can we manage to hace two APPs in flash with diferent interrupt
> > vector tables?
> 
> Probably the best way to accomplish this would be to have the vectors
at
> the base of user RAM, then simply swap them in and out to match the
> application currently running.
> 
> Ryan
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
________________________________________________________________________
>
________________________________________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.