Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Thread

LPC2292/4 Power Consumption

LPC2292/4 Power Consumption

2004-10-19 by bty639886

Hi,

Does anyone have any figures for the LPC2292 power consumption on 
the 3.3V and 1.8V rails for the LPC2292 running at 60Mhz with all 
peripherals enabled and running with VPBDiv=1 (ie at 60Mhz also)?

Any info would be great,

thanks and kind regards,

pete

Re: [lpc2000] LPC2292/4 Power Consumption

2004-10-19 by Ing. Boris Králik

My configuration consumation cca. 25mA, both supplies,
Fosc=24MHz, Fcco=48MHz, M=1, P=1
(without peripherals) 
When I check system with peripherals, power
consumation was more.
 --- bty639886 <peter.brown@...> wrote: 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Does anyone have any figures for the LPC2292 power
> consumption on 
> the 3.3V and 1.8V rails for the LPC2292 running at
> 60Mhz with all 
> peripherals enabled and running with VPBDiv=1 (ie at
> 60Mhz also)?
> 
> Any info would be great,
> 
> thanks and kind regards,
> 
> pete
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  

=====
Regards / S pozdravom Ing. Boris Kralik

http://www.geocities.com/kralikbo/
-------------------------------------------------
GSM CZ: +420 776 819 899


	
	
		
___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!  http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

Re: LPC2292/4 Power Consumption

2004-10-20 by lpc2100_fan

Hello Pete,

at 60 MHz with peripherals enabled (all) and the VPBDIV set to not
divide (/1), we saw close to 50 mAs tops. 

Cheers, Bob
--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Ing. Boris Králik" <kralikbo@y...> wrote:
> My configuration consumation cca. 25mA, both supplies,
> Fosc=24MHz, Fcco=48MHz, M=1, P=1
> (without peripherals) 
> When I check system with peripherals, power
> consumation was more.
>  --- bty639886 <peter.brown@b...> wrote: 
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Does anyone have any figures for the LPC2292 power
> > consumption on 
> > the 3.3V and 1.8V rails for the LPC2292 running at
> > 60Mhz with all 
> > peripherals enabled and running with VPBDiv=1 (ie at
> > 60Mhz also)?
> > 
> > Any info would be great,
> > 
> > thanks and kind regards,
> > 
> > pete
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  
> 
> =====
> Regards / S pozdravom Ing. Boris Kralik
> 
> http://www.geocities.com/kralikbo/
> -------------------------------------------------
> GSM CZ: +420 776 819 899
> 
> 
> 	
> 	
> 		
> ___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW
Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! 
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

Re: LPC2292/4 Power Consumption

2004-10-20 by bty639886

Hi Bob

Great! Thanks!
Cool as a cucumber eh!!!

rgds
pete

--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "lpc2100_fan" <lpc2100_fan@y...> 
wrote:
> 
> Hello Pete,
> 
> at 60 MHz with peripherals enabled (all) and the VPBDIV set to not
> divide (/1), we saw close to 50 mAs tops. 
> 
> Cheers, Bob
> --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Ing. Boris Králik" 
<kralikbo@y...> wrote:
> > My configuration consumation cca. 25mA, both supplies,
> > Fosc=24MHz, Fcco=48MHz, M=1, P=1
> > (without peripherals) 
> > When I check system with peripherals, power
> > consumation was more.
> >  --- bty639886 <peter.brown@b...> wrote: 
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Does anyone have any figures for the LPC2292 power
> > > consumption on 
> > > the 3.3V and 1.8V rails for the LPC2292 running at
> > > 60Mhz with all 
> > > peripherals enabled and running with VPBDiv=1 (ie at
> > > 60Mhz also)?
> > > 
> > > Any info would be great,
> > > 
> > > thanks and kind regards,
> > > 
> > > pete
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  
> > 
> > =====
> > Regards / S pozdravom Ing. Boris Kralik
> > 
> > http://www.geocities.com/kralikbo/
> > -------------------------------------------------
> > GSM CZ: +420 776 819 899
> > 
> > 
> > 	
> > 	
> > 		
> > ___________________________________________________________ALL-
NEW
> Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! 
> http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.