Lpc2000

The subject is not a typo.

Some of you have certainly seen this by now

http://www.reed-electronics.com/electronicnews/article/CA505862?nid=2019

Basically a 200MHz ARM9 core.  Not really very much information (typical 
press release and I haven't found anything else).

They do suggest motor control as a target, but there is no mention of PWM 
which is a major oversight if true.

Intriguingly it has a floating point unit on board.

They are talking sampling in Q2 so very much vapour at the moment.

Robert

" 'Freedom' has no meaning of itself.  There are always restrictions,
be they legal, genetic, or physical.  If you don't believe me, try to
chew a radio signal. "

                         Kelvin Throop, III

From: Robert Adsett [mailto:subscriptions@...]
> Basically a 200MHz ARM9 core.  Not really very much information
(typical 
> press release and I haven't found anything else).

There's an article about it in ESE this month:
http://i.cmpnet.com/embedded/europe/esefeb05/esefeb05p34.pdf

Tim

I don't think a higher end device like this would benefit those currently 
designing with the LPC2K series devices. This is because ARM9 devices 
typically don't contain Flash, and sometimes no RAM for that matter. They 
are usually targeted for full-featured OSs (Linux, VxWorks, etc.) that can 
take advantage of the caches, MMU, etc.. They also have much higher pin 
counts (and more often than not are only available in BGA).

A good example is the ARM9200 from Atmel (which although is available in a 
super large 208 pin PQFP it contains no Flash so it is not suitable for my 
designs which don't have the board space, cost or design time budget to 
add external Flash and SRAM/SDRAM).

Don't get me wrong, I am very much looking forward to seeing what Philips 
can do with ARM9, yet it won't be your typically LPC2K part. However in 
the future (probably not near, mind you) we could see super SoC ARM9 
devices with 1MB of Flash and RAM, or more - how many designers 5 years 
ago were dreaming of 32 bit RISC with 1/2MB Flash and 64KB RAM on chip, 
and now that is a reality thanks to Philips, Atmel and others???

- Rod

--
                          ___  ____  ___    _      ___
  Rod Moffitt            / _ \/ __ \/ _ \  (_)__  / _/__
  http://rod.info       / , _/ /_/ / // / / / _ \/ _/ _ \
  rodANTISPAM@... /_/|_|\____/____(*)_/_//_/_/ \___/
  =======================================================
  ~ Where loved ones are remembered http://memoriam.org ~

On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Robert Adsett wrote:

>
> The subject is not a typo.
>
> Some of you have certainly seen this by now
>
> http://www.reed-electronics.com/electronicnews/article/CA505862?nid=2019
>
> Basically a 200MHz ARM9 core.  Not really very much information (typical
> press release and I haven't found anything else).
>
> They do suggest motor control as a target, but there is no mention of PWM
> which is a major oversight if true.
>
> Intriguingly it has a floating point unit on board.
>
> They are talking sampling in Q2 so very much vapour at the moment.
>
> Robert
>
> " 'Freedom' has no meaning of itself.  There are always restrictions,
> be they legal, genetic, or physical.  If you don't believe me, try to
> chew a radio signal. "
>
>                         Kelvin Throop, III
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Rod Moffitt <rodlist@r...> wrote:
> I don't think a higher end device like this would benefit those
currently 
> designing with the LPC2K series devices. This is because ARM9 devices 
> typically don't contain Flash, and sometimes no RAM for that matter.
They 
> are usually targeted for full-featured OSs (Linux, VxWorks, etc.)
that can 
> take advantage of the caches, MMU, etc.. They also have much higher pin 
> counts (and more often than not are only available in BGA).
> 
> A good example is the ARM9200 from Atmel (which although is
available in a 
> super large 208 pin PQFP it contains no Flash so it is not suitable
for my 
> designs which don't have the board space, cost or design time budget to 
> add external Flash and SRAM/SDRAM).
> 
> Don't get me wrong, I am very much looking forward to seeing what
Philips 
> can do with ARM9, yet it won't be your typically LPC2K part. However in 
> the future (probably not near, mind you) we could see super SoC ARM9 
> devices with 1MB of Flash and RAM, or more - how many designers 5 years 
> ago were dreaming of 32 bit RISC with 1/2MB Flash and 64KB RAM on chip, 
> and now that is a reality thanks to Philips, Atmel and others???


Yes, I have seen the same thing.  I expect the 3000 is aimed at the
PDA and similar markets given the OTG USB and no Ethernet.

It's official, The LPC3000 ARM9 family has been announced by Philips. I am 
surprised no one else saw this (it appears to be from the 23rd):

http://www.semiconductors.philips.com/news/content/file_1139.html

- Rod

--
                          ___  ____  ___    _      ___
  Rod Moffitt            / _ \/ __ \/ _ \  (_)__  / _/__
  http://rod.info       / , _/ /_/ / // / / / _ \/ _/ _ \
  rodANTISPAM@... /_/|_|\____/____(*)_/_//_/_/ \___/
  =======================================================
  ~ Where loved ones are remembered http://memoriam.org ~

On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Robert Adsett wrote:

>
> The subject is not a typo.
>
> Some of you have certainly seen this by now
>
> http://www.reed-electronics.com/electronicnews/article/CA505862?nid=2019
>
> Basically a 200MHz ARM9 core.  Not really very much information (typical
> press release and I haven't found anything else).
>
> They do suggest motor control as a target, but there is no mention of PWM
> which is a major oversight if true.
>
> Intriguingly it has a floating point unit on board.
>
> They are talking sampling in Q2 so very much vapour at the moment.
>
> Robert
>
> " 'Freedom' has no meaning of itself.  There are always restrictions,
> be they legal, genetic, or physical.  If you don't believe me, try to
> chew a radio signal. "
>
>                         Kelvin Throop, III
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

At 01:56 PM 2/26/05 -0500, Rod Moffitt wrote:
>It's official, The LPC3000 ARM9 family has been announced by Philips. I am
>surprised no one else saw this (it appears to be from the 23rd):

Umm, that would be the press release I pointed to on the 23'rd under the 
thread LPC3000 ;)

Robert

" 'Freedom' has no meaning of itself.  There are always restrictions,
be they legal, genetic, or physical.  If you don't believe me, try to
chew a radio signal. "

                         Kelvin Throop, III

----- Original Message ----- 

From: "Rod Moffitt" <rodlist@...>
To: <lpc2000@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2005 6:56 PM
Subject: [lpc2000] no rumor, it's official, The LPC3000 ARM9 family was 
announced by Philips


>
> It's official, The LPC3000 ARM9 family has been announced by Philips. I am
> surprised no one else saw this (it appears to be from the 23rd):
>
> http://www.semiconductors.philips.com/news/content/file_1139.html

I am registered for a news email every week from Philips, and it was in this 
morning's missive.

Leon 



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 22/02/2005

Hi all,

Why is the damn capture module counting towards no end without a stop!?
It should count to 2200 according to my calculations!?

Why does it increment all the time?

int main (void) 
{
unsigned long rising;
PINSEL0 = 0x00A50000; // set RX,TX and Capture on both CAP1,1 and CAP1,0
init_serial();
init_capture();

  while (1)
  {
  rising = T1CR1;
  printf("\r\nT1CR1=%lu",rising);
  }
}

void init_capture ( void )
{
T1CCR = (1<<3);    // Capture CAP1,1 Rising only...
T1PR  = 0xF;       // Pclk=15MHz, Pclk/15=1MHz=1uS 
                   //time to capture is 455Hz so cycles should be 2,200
T1TCR = 2;         // Reset counter...
T1TCR = 1;	        // Start the timer...
}

At 11:17 PM 2/26/05 +0100, Lasse Madsen wrote:
>Why is the damn capture module counting towards no end without a stop!?
>It should count to 2200 according to my calculations!?
>
>Why does it increment all the time?

Because there is nothing to stop it?

You have to set up trigger on a rising edge and if your comment is correct 
you expect a rising edge every few milliseconds.  Assuming a 9600 bd serial 
port you will only get a couple of characters out in that time so you will 
get several captures for each print cycle each capture higher than the 
other (by about 2200) until the 32bit timer overflows.

Basically it's doing what it's supposed to.

Robert

" 'Freedom' has no meaning of itself.  There are always restrictions,
be they legal, genetic, or physical.  If you don't believe me, try to
chew a radio signal. "

                         Kelvin Throop, III

Hi Robert,

I finally figured it out around 3:30 AM.

Void main (void)
{
  while (1)                              /* Loop forever */
  {
  delay();
  printf("\r\nresultat=%d",value);
  }
}

/* Timer Counter 0 Interrupt executes each 10ms @ 60 MHz CPU Clock */
void tc1 (void) __irq 
{
printf("!");
//value = T1CR1;
T1IR        = 0x20;                         // Clear interrupt flag
VICVectAddr = 0;                            // Acknowledge Interrupt
}

void init_capture ( void )
{
PINSEL0 = 0x00A50000; // set RX,TX and Capture on both CAP1,1 and CAP1,0
VICVectAddr0 = (unsigned long)tc1;          // set interrupt vector in 0
VICVectCntl0 = 0x20 | 5;                    // use it for Timer 1 Interrupt
VICIntEnable = 0x00000010;                  // Enable Timer0 Interrupt
T1CCR = ((1<<5) | (1<<3));                  // Capture CAP1,1 Rising only...
T1PR  = 0xF;
T1TCR = 2;                                  // Reset counter...
T1TCR = 1;			           // Start counter again...
}


And I felt pretty stupid about the all incrementing thing as I realized that
the Timer 1 was running for it self as a separate thing, on the smaller
processors that I have played with before the counter would be automatically
reset etc. ... but I guess it makes sense now that I know it he he :)

Thanks for the clarification

Best regards
Lasse Madsen

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Adsett [mailto:subscriptions@...] 
Sent: 27. februar 2005 05:45
To: lpc2000@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lpc2000] Capture problem - counting towards no end...


At 11:17 PM 2/26/05 +0100, Lasse Madsen wrote:
>Why is the damn capture module counting towards no end without a stop!?
>It should count to 2200 according to my calculations!?
>
>Why does it increment all the time?

Because there is nothing to stop it?

You have to set up trigger on a rising edge and if your comment is correct 
you expect a rising edge every few milliseconds.  Assuming a 9600 bd serial 
port you will only get a couple of characters out in that time so you will 
get several captures for each print cycle each capture higher than the 
other (by about 2200) until the 32bit timer overflows.

Basically it's doing what it's supposed to.

Robert

" 'Freedom' has no meaning of itself.  There are always restrictions,
be they legal, genetic, or physical.  If you don't believe me, try to
chew a radio signal. "

                         Kelvin Throop, III



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

At 01:11 PM 2/27/05 +0100, Lasse Madsen wrote:
>And I felt pretty stupid about the all incrementing thing as I realized that
>the Timer 1 was running for it self as a separate thing, on the smaller
>processors that I have played with before the counter would be automatically
>reset etc. ... but I guess it makes sense now that I know it he he :)

I've (on more than a few occasions) also let my experience read into a 
datasheet something that wasn't there  Usually it gets caught quickly, 
often on the second read, sometimes though the same passage can be read 
wrong several times.  Such experience can also make it easier to recognize 
datasheet descriptions that are likely wrong or written in a misleading 
fashion so there is an advantage to it :)

Robert

" 'Freedom' has no meaning of itself.  There are always restrictions,
be they legal, genetic, or physical.  If you don't believe me, try to
chew a radio signal. "

                         Kelvin Throop, III

Interesting, because all I could see in your email was a link to an
article (not a press release) for 'Electronic News', with no link to the
official press release to be found in your email, nor in the article for
that matter.

- Rod

--
                          ___  ____  ___    _      ___
  Rod Moffitt            / _ \/ __ \/ _ \  (_)__  / _/__
  http://rod.info       / , _/ /_/ / // / / / _ \/ _/ _ \
  rodANTISPAM@... /_/|_|\____/____(*)_/_//_/_/ \___/
  =======================================================
  ~ Where loved ones are remembered http://memoriam.org ~

On Sat, 26 Feb 2005, Robert Adsett wrote:

>
> At 01:56 PM 2/26/05 -0500, Rod Moffitt wrote:
>> It's official, The LPC3000 ARM9 family has been announced by Philips. I am
>> surprised no one else saw this (it appears to be from the 23rd):
>
> Umm, that would be the press release I pointed to on the 23'rd under the
> thread LPC3000 ;)
>
> Robert
>
> " 'Freedom' has no meaning of itself.  There are always restrictions,
> be they legal, genetic, or physical.  If you don't believe me, try to
> chew a radio signal. "
>
>                         Kelvin Throop, III
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

At 09:25 AM 2/28/05 -0500, Rod Moffitt wrote:
>Interesting, because all I could see in your email was a link to an
>article (not a press release) for 'Electronic News', with no link to the
>official press release to be found in your email, nor in the article for
>that matter.

Hmm, looked like a standard editorial rewrite of a press release to me 
(even on first read, a re-read simply confirms it).  I expect I was 
reacting as much to the implicit characterization of the release (even 
rewritten) of a Philips press release by one of the long standing media 
outlets as rumor.

Neither version of the press release has any significant real information 
or any pointers to real information.

BTW, it appears to be Philips practice to delay posting press releases 
until the various media outlets have had if for a few days.  Whether that's 
deliberate or a consequence of internal bureaucratic delays I have no idea, 
but I've seen it before on other press releases.


Robert


" 'Freedom' has no meaning of itself.  There are always restrictions,
be they legal, genetic, or physical.  If you don't believe me, try to
chew a radio signal. "

                         Kelvin Throop, III

The Press Release for the ARM9 LPC3000 family is now posted on their 
website.

http://www.semiconductors.philips.com/news/content/file_1139.html



--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Robert Adsett <subscriptions@a...> 
wrote:
> At 09:25 AM 2/28/05 -0500, Rod Moffitt wrote:
> >Interesting, because all I could see in your email was a link to an
> >article (not a press release) for 'Electronic News', with no link 
to the
> >official press release to be found in your email, nor in the 
article for
> >that matter.
> 
> Hmm, looked like a standard editorial rewrite of a press release to 
me 
> (even on first read, a re-read simply confirms it).  I expect I was 
> reacting as much to the implicit characterization of the release 
(even 
> rewritten) of a Philips press release by one of the long standing 
media 
> outlets as rumor.
> 
> Neither version of the press release has any significant real 
information 
> or any pointers to real information.
> 
> BTW, it appears to be Philips practice to delay posting press 
releases 
> until the various media outlets have had if for a few days.  
Whether that's 
> deliberate or a consequence of internal bureaucratic delays I have 
no idea, 
> but I've seen it before on other press releases.
> 
> 
> Robert
> 
> 
> " 'Freedom' has no meaning of itself.  There are always 
restrictions,
> be they legal, genetic, or physical.  If you don't believe me, try 
to

> chew a radio signal. "
> 
>                          Kelvin Throop, III

I saw an LPC3000 today on a Nohau board.
I have schematics and user's manual for
the board, but the user's manual is 16 
Mbytes, so I won't upload it.

There are app notes on the Nohau web site 
here:

http://www.nohau.com/pd_appnotes_arm.html

Nothing else I could find.  No datasheets 
on the Philips web site.  Does anyone know
where I can get more information?

Regards:


Mike Nelson
http://MichaelTNelson.com


		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com

Mike Nelson wrote:

> Nothing else I could find.  No datasheets
> on the Philips web site.  Does anyone know
> where I can get more information?


Google Is Your Friend :o)

I just types in LPC3000 and the first link I got when to the Philips 
website: http://www.semiconductors.philips.com/news/content/file_1139.html
I get the same page by typing in lpc3000 in the search bar at the 
http://www.semiconductor.philips.com website.

 From the item on the Philips website I read The family runs at 200 MHz, 
contains up to 7 UARTS, SPI, I2C, USB OTG Nand Flash interface and others.
Samples would be available Q2 2005

I'm hoping they will also bring a multi level die version with SDRAM and 
Flash included in the package. This would definitely give a 1 chip Linux 
device.

I heard a rumour that it may be based upon the same design as the 
PNX4008 (Nexperia mobile multi media application processor), could 
someone from Philips Marketing confirm this?

Rob

--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Mike Nelson <m1k3n3ls0n@y...> wrote:
>
> I saw an LPC3000 today on a Nohau board.
> I have schematics and user's manual for
> the board, but the user's manual is 16 
> Mbytes, so I won't upload it.
> 


Can you upload it to some other site or send private mail?

BR,
Slawc

If someone wants send me a private email and I'll put it up on my 
website.

--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "slawcus" <slawcus@y...> wrote:

>
> --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Mike Nelson <m1k3n3ls0n@y...> wrote:
> >
> > I saw an LPC3000 today on a Nohau board.
> > I have schematics and user's manual for
> > the board, but the user's manual is 16 
> > Mbytes, so I won't upload it.
> > 
> 
> 
> Can you upload it to some other site or send private mail?
> 
> BR,
> Slawc
>

Sorry, what I meant is if someone sends me the files I can host them 
on my website, but I don't have them yet.

--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "seangra" <sgraham@o...> wrote:
>
> If someone wants send me a private email and I'll put it up on my 
> website.
> 
> --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "slawcus" <slawcus@y...> wrote:
> >
> > --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Mike Nelson <m1k3n3ls0n@y...> 
wrote:

> > >
> > > I saw an LPC3000 today on a Nohau board.
> > > I have schematics and user's manual for
> > > the board, but the user's manual is 16 
> > > Mbytes, so I won't upload it.
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > Can you upload it to some other site or send private mail?
> > 
> > BR,
> > Slawc
> >
>

> --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Mike Nelson <m1k3n3ls0n@y...> wrote:
> >
> > I saw an LPC3000 today on a Nohau board.
> > I have schematics and user's manual for
> > the board, but the user's manual is 16 
> > Mbytes, so I won't upload it.
> > 
> 


Mike,  would you please post a link to where you found all this.

Thanks

hamilton

> I just types in LPC3000 and the first link I got when to the Philips
> website: http://www.semiconductors.philips.com/news/content/file_1139.html
> I get the same page by typing in lpc3000 in the search bar at the
> http://www.semiconductor.philips.com website.
>
> From the item on the Philips website I read The family runs at 200 MHz,
> contains up to 7 UARTS, SPI, I2C, USB OTG Nand Flash interface and others.
> Samples would be available Q2 2005

This doesn't help Mike, but more info can be found in this report:
http://www.arm.com/miscPDFs/8857.pdf


Joel

Rob:

I saw the press release, but I need hard data,
not marketing fluff.  I need to know the address
map for flash, RAM, and register access, and the
bit definitions for the registers.  There's nothing
like that anywhere I looked.

Thanks anyway.

Regards:

Mike Nelson

--- Rob Jansen <rob@...> wrote:

> Mike Nelson wrote:
> 
> > Nothing else I could find.  No datasheets
> > on the Philips web site.  Does anyone know
> > where I can get more information?
> 
> 
> Google Is Your Friend :o)
> 
> I just types in LPC3000 and the first link I got
> when to the Philips 
> website:
>
http://www.semiconductors.philips.com/news/content/file_1139.html
> I get the same page by typing in lpc3000 in the
> search bar at the 
> http://www.semiconductor.philips.com website.



	
		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com

Slawc:

I would prefer that Nohau release the documentation
themselves, since it is their board.  I don't know
if my employer is under a Non-Disclosure Agreement
about the board, or not.

Regards:

Mike Nelson

--- slawcus <slawcus@...> wrote:

> --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Mike Nelson
> <m1k3n3ls0n@y...> wrote:
> >
> > I saw an LPC3000 today on a Nohau board.
> > I have schematics and user's manual for
> > the board, but the user's manual is 16 
> > Mbytes, so I won't upload it.
> > 
> 
> 
> Can you upload it to some other site or send private
> mail?
> 
> BR,
> Slawc
> 
> 
> 
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page! 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

Hamilton:

I wish I could, but it's not available on the Nohau
site or the Philips site.  We got the Nohau board
with preliminary Nohau documentation from a Philips
representative.  My purpose in posting the initial
message was to solicit Philips or Nohau for hard
information, like a datasheet, on the LPC3000.

Regards:

Mike Nelson

--- donhamilton2002 <hamilton@...> wrote:

> > --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Mike Nelson
> <m1k3n3ls0n@y...> wrote:
> > >
> > > I saw an LPC3000 today on a Nohau board.
> > > I have schematics and user's manual for
> > > the board, but the user's manual is 16 
> > > Mbytes, so I won't upload it.
> > > 
> > 
> 
> 
> Mike,  would you please post a link to where you
> found all this.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> hamilton
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



	
		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com

Hmm. 200MHz and 250mA. That doesnt sound too
impressive (dont know if this is just while(1){} or
with all peripherals exercised at 66%, but its not
amazing to me). However its the 20MIPS @ 5mA thats
interesting. I hope I see something similar with
external sram and flash (should be a total of under
10mA @ 0.9V all devices). 

Interesting and very much. But the press release does
not knock my socks off. Maybe the datasheets for the
low end versions will.

--- Joel Winarske <joelw@...> wrote:

> > I just types in LPC3000 and the first link I got
> when to the Philips
> > website:
>
http://www.semiconductors.philips.com/news/content/file_1139.html

> > I get the same page by typing in lpc3000 in the
> search bar at the
> > http://www.semiconductor.philips.com website.
> >
> > From the item on the Philips website I read The
> family runs at 200 MHz,
> > contains up to 7 UARTS, SPI, I2C, USB OTG Nand
> Flash interface and others.
> > Samples would be available Q2 2005
> 
> This doesn't help Mike, but more info can be found
> in this report:
> http://www.arm.com/miscPDFs/8857.pdf
> 
> 
> Joel 
> 
> 
>

Hello,

I just came from N\ufffdrnberg. Philips demonstrated development board with 
Linux. There was also atmel with ARM9.

Just two photos...
LPC3000: http://www.feltna.com/media/embedded2006/IMG_5047.JPG
ATMEL: http://www.feltna.com/media/embedded2006/IMG_5058.JPG

Rod Moffitt wrote:

> I don't think a higher end device like this would benefit those currently
> designing with the LPC2K series devices. This is because ARM9 devices
> typically don't contain Flash, and sometimes no RAM for that matter. They
> are usually targeted for full-featured OSs (Linux, VxWorks, etc.) that 
> can
> take advantage of the caches, MMU, etc.. They also have much higher pin
> counts (and more often than not are only available in BGA).
>
> A good example is the ARM9200 from Atmel (which although is available 
> in a
> super large 208 pin PQFP it contains no Flash so it is not suitable 
> for my
> designs which don't have the board space, cost or design time budget to
> add external Flash and SRAM/SDRAM).
>
> Don't get me wrong, I am very much looking forward to seeing what Philips
> can do with ARM9, yet it won't be your typically LPC2K part. However in
> the future (probably not near, mind you) we could see super SoC ARM9
> devices with 1MB of Flash and RAM, or more - how many designers 5 years
> ago were dreaming of 32 bit RISC with 1/2MB Flash and 64KB RAM on chip,
> and now that is a reality thanks to Philips, Atmel and others???
>

OKI has ARM9 with flash  ML69Q6203LA

LPC3180 looks good as it has USB OTG and more important lll DDRAM/SDRAM and BAND flash interface and DMA channels.
It does lack LCD but could be tageted at different market.
Small size i.e. smaller than 14 X 14 in BGA...
So far not Hardware technical documentation except data sheet for development.
Any idea where can I find user guide Hardware/firmware documentation for LPC3180...???


k b 

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Marko Pavlin (home) 
  To: lpc2000@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 5:20 PM
  Subject: Re: [lpc2000] LPC3000


  Hello,

  I just came from Nürnberg. Philips demonstrated development board with 
  Linux. There was also atmel with ARM9.

  Just two photos...
  LPC3000: http://www.feltna.com/media/embedded2006/IMG_5047.JPG
  ATMEL: http://www.feltna.com/media/embedded2006/IMG_5058.JPG

  Rod Moffitt wrote:

  > I don't think a higher end device like this would benefit those currently
  > designing with the LPC2K series devices. This is because ARM9 devices
  > typically don't contain Flash, and sometimes no RAM for that matter. They
  > are usually targeted for full-featured OSs (Linux, VxWorks, etc.) that 
  > can
  > take advantage of the caches, MMU, etc.. They also have much higher pin
  > counts (and more often than not are only available in BGA).
  >
  > A good example is the ARM9200 from Atmel (which although is available 
  > in a
  > super large 208 pin PQFP it contains no Flash so it is not suitable 
  > for my
  > designs which don't have the board space, cost or design time budget to
  > add external Flash and SRAM/SDRAM).
  >
  > Don't get me wrong, I am very much looking forward to seeing what Philips
  > can do with ARM9, yet it won't be your typically LPC2K part. However in
  > the future (probably not near, mind you) we could see super SoC ARM9
  > devices with 1MB of Flash and RAM, or more - how many designers 5 years
  > ago were dreaming of 32 bit RISC with 1/2MB Flash and 64KB RAM on chip,
  > and now that is a reality thanks to Philips, Atmel and others???
  >



  SPONSORED LINKS Microcontrollers  Microprocessor  Intel microprocessors  
        Pic microcontrollers  


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 

    a..  Visit your group "lpc2000" on the web.
      
    b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     lpc2000-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      
    c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.10/263 - Release Date: 16/02/2006


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Try the following website for the LPC3080 users manual. I had a little getting all the pages but maby they have fixed the problem by now.
  http://www.mt-system.ru/pub/bc48a0e831394464907752ee1f91d712.pdf
  

K B Shah-lascaux <kbshah@...> wrote:
  OKI has ARM9 with flash  ML69Q6203LA

LPC3180 looks good as it has USB OTG and more important lll DDRAM/SDRAM and BAND flash interface and DMA channels.
It does lack LCD but could be tageted at different market.
Small size i.e. smaller than 14 X 14 in BGA...
So far not Hardware technical documentation except data sheet for development.
Any idea where can I find user guide Hardware/firmware documentation for LPC3180...???


k b 

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Marko Pavlin (home) 
  To: lpc2000@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 5:20 PM
  Subject: Re: [lpc2000] LPC3000


  Hello,

  I just came from Nürnberg. Philips demonstrated development board with 
  Linux. There was also atmel with ARM9.

  Just two photos...
  LPC3000: http://www.feltna.com/media/embedded2006/IMG_5047.JPG
  ATMEL: http://www.feltna.com/media/embedded2006/IMG_5058.JPG

  Rod Moffitt wrote:

  > I don't think a higher end device like this would benefit those currently
  > designing with the LPC2K series devices. This is because ARM9 devices
  > typically don't contain Flash, and sometimes no RAM for that matter. They
  > are usually targeted for full-featured OSs (Linux, VxWorks, etc.) that 
  > can
  > take advantage of the caches, MMU, etc.. They also have much higher pin
  > counts (and more often than not are only available in BGA).
  >
  > A good example is the ARM9200 from Atmel (which although is available 
  > in a
  > super large 208 pin PQFP it contains no Flash so it is not suitable 
  > for my
  > designs which don't have the board space, cost or design time budget to
  > add external Flash and SRAM/SDRAM).
  >
  > Don't get me wrong, I am very much looking forward to seeing what Philips
  > can do with ARM9, yet it won't be your typically LPC2K part. However in
  > the future (probably not near, mind you) we could see super SoC ARM9
  > devices with 1MB of Flash and RAM, or more - how many designers 5 years
  > ago were dreaming of 32 bit RISC with 1/2MB Flash and 64KB RAM on chip,
  > and now that is a reality thanks to Philips, Atmel and others???
  >



  SPONSORED LINKS Microcontrollers  Microprocessor  Intel microprocessors  
        Pic microcontrollers  


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 

    a..  Visit your group "lpc2000" on the web.
      
    b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     lpc2000-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      
    c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.10/263 - Release Date: 16/02/2006


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



  SPONSORED LINKS 
        Microcontrollers   Microprocessor   Intel microprocessors     Pic microcontrollers 
    
---------------------------------
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 

    
    Visit your group "lpc2000" on the web.
    
    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 lpc2000-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    
    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 

    
---------------------------------
  



			
---------------------------------
 Yahoo! Mail
 Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Alexander K. Carey wrote:
> Try the following website for the LPC3080 users manual. I had a little 
> getting all the pages but maby they have fixed the problem by now.
>   http://www.mt-system.ru/pub/bc48a0e831394464907752ee1f91d712.pdf
>  
> 
>

It's same as on philips page:
http://www.standardics.philips.com/products/lpc3000/pdf/lpc3180.pdf