Hi Bob and Charles,
sorry for starting this mess in the wrong group. At least I have
learned more about the LPC2000 flash devices. But I have still the
problem with my LPC901.
Thanks to everybody Best Regards Frank
--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "lpc2100_fan" <lpc2100_fan@y...>
wrote:
>
> Hi Frank and Charles,
>
> there seems to be a little mix up here:
> Frank you are talking about LPC900 and yes you can program byte by
> byte and use the program memory very easy as EEPROM.
> Charles, I guess you are talking about the LPC2000 flash devices
where
> byte programming as EEPROM replacement can only be done in larger
> chunks as discussed before in this group.
>
> Frank, you asked your question in the correct group LPC900_users as
> well, this group is for the LPC2000 devices and EEPROM is very
> different than on the LPC900, that's where the confusion comes
from.
>
> hth, Bob
>
> --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "embeddedjanitor" <manningc2@a...>
wrote:
> >
> > --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "frankausloehne" <frank@f...>
wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello to everybody
> > > I am using IAP to program the FLASH memory ,to store
permanently some
> > > data, as I have not included EEPROM in my target board.So my
> > > application itself is programming the FLASH to recall some data
> > > during next power ON.
> > > I am using the assembler-code which I found in the user manual
> > > LPC901..... It runs very well in my software-simulator in
Keils
> > > µVision3. When I am using Keils EPM900-Emulatorboard it also
runs
> > > good. When I use it on Chip, I always read different numbers
from the
> > > same address.
> > > H E L P me please. Is here anybody who can help me, to program
some
> > > code, which runs on chip and in the emulator?
> > > How about this: Write #89H into code:0801H -- than read from
0801H
> > > and store in ACC
> > > It would be nice to hear from anybody Best Regards Frank
> >
> > You can only effectively program 512byte chunks at a time on
512byte
> > boundaries.
> >
> > If you want to only update a few bytes at a time you're
progbably going
> > to have to read in the page, erase it and rewrite the modified
page.
> >
> > The IAP routines work fine for me.