Lpc2000

Does anybody know if problems with the LPC2119/29 FullCAN hardware have 
been fixed or when they will be fixed?
Does anybody know the extent of the problems?

>Does anybody know if problems with the LPC2119/29 FullCAN hardware have
>been fixed or when they will be fixed?
>Does anybody know the extent of the problems?

Sounds like they plan to address all errata sheet items.   I had to move six 
product designs to ST parts because of the Rev A. errors.

This was my question, I was asking about the LPC2129:
(I was under the influence of too many part numbers...)

>> Is Phillips shipping a revision B on the LPC2919 yet?
>> If not does anyone have an idea when they might?
>>
>> Will rev B address all of the rev A errata?
>>
>> Joel
>
>
> Joel,
>
> 1. don't know exactly which device you refer to, 2119/2129/2194? but
> the answer to shipping yet is "not yet"
> 2. When: Starting end of the year (2005;-) into Q1/2006 for volume
> 3. Yes, this redesign is primarily a bug fix (all of them).
>
> Philips Apps

How have you found ST? I got badly burnt with ST on a number of ocassions... Admittedly quite a few years ago but I was thinking of using some of their stuff again... I do like the fact that Philips admit to the problems that they have. I have found quite a few companies, when I have had problems, have grudgingly admitted that they had known about the isses for a while...

-----Original Message-----
From: lpc2000@yahoogroups.com [mailto:lpc2000@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Joel Winarske
Sent: Friday, 19 August 2005 2:04 AM
To: lpc2000@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lpc2000] FullCAN

>Does anybody know if problems with the LPC2119/29 FullCAN hardware have 
>been fixed or when they will be fixed?
>Does anybody know the extent of the problems?

Sounds like they plan to address all errata sheet items.   I had to move six 
product designs to ST parts because of the Rev A. errors.

This was my question, I was asking about the LPC2129:
(I was under the influence of too many part numbers...)

>> Is Phillips shipping a revision B on the LPC2919 yet?
>> If not does anyone have an idea when they might?
>>
>> Will rev B address all of the rev A errata?
>>
>> Joel
>
>
> Joel,
>
> 1. don't know exactly which device you refer to, 2119/2129/2194? but 
> the answer to shipping yet is "not yet"
> 2. When: Starting end of the year (2005;-) into Q1/2006 for volume 3. 
> Yes, this redesign is primarily a bug fix (all of them).
>
> Philips Apps




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
<font face=arial size=-1><a href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12hbti2a4/M=362131.6882499.7825260.1510227/D=groups/S=1706554205:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1124395477/A=2889191/R=0/SIG=10r90krvo/*http://www.thebeehive.org
">Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job) Welcome to the Sweet Life - brought to you by One Economy</a>.</font>
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 



--
This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.  
Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of NAUTRONIX LTD.

If you are not the intended recipient, you have received this email in error and use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error please contact the sender.   

Although our computer systems use active virus protection software, and we take various measures to reduce the risk of viruses being transmitted in e-mail messages and attachments sent from this company, we cannot guarantee that such e-mail messages and attachments are free from viruses on receipt.  It is a condition of our using e-mail to correspond with you, that any and all liability on our part arising directly or indirectly out of any virus is excluded.  Please ensure that you run virus checking software on all e-mail messages and attachments before reading them.

>Tim Wade wrote:
>
>How have you found ST? I got badly burnt with ST on a number of 
>ocassions... Admittedly quite a few years ago but I was thinking of using 
>some of their stuff again... I do like the fact that Philips admit to the 
>problems that >they have. I have found quite a few companies, when I have 
>had problems, have grudgingly admitted that they had known about the isses 
>for a while...

Yes honesty in a manufacturer is paramount, let alone in any business 
partner.

The product we're using is the STR712.  Pretty decent peripheral software 
libs, and a useful timing spreadsheet.  The software libs offer a decent 
head start, but it's not clear on the quality of test coverage.  We're 
running a protocol variation of SAE J1939, 16k of RAM for stack and 
application is a bit too small for comfort, 32k is good, 64k offers a 
feature upgrade path.  Silicon errata, RAM size, pin compatibility, and 
package options were the deciding factors.  At the moment availability looks 
very good.

Freescale has an interesting new offering, the MAC7100 series.  But no clear 
answer on production eta.  It seems Freescale has taken the route of more 
RAM like ST.
An interesting side note is the MAC7100 series came up with the smallest 
code density on some quick IAR compilation tests.  I've been meaning to drop 
IAR an email about this.

Joel

The MAC7100 series looks interesting. My current interest is really in a
very small footprint device with USB so I think that the SAM7 will be
the go. In some respects it was a bit of a sad day that Motorola rolled
over and canned the 68K and went ARM. But then again it is nice not
having to replace all the devlopment tools every project! ;-)

-----Original Message-----
From: lpc2000@yahoogroups.com [mailto:lpc2000@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Joel Winarske
Sent: Friday, 19 August 2005 2:34 PM
To: lpc2000@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lpc2000] FullCAN

Freescale has an interesting new offering, the MAC7100 series.  But no
clear answer on production eta.  It seems Freescale has taken the route
of more RAM like ST.
An interesting side note is the MAC7100 series came up with the smallest
code density on some quick IAR compilation tests.  I've been meaning to
drop IAR an email about this.

Joel

--
This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.  
Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of NAUTRONIX LTD.

If you are not the intended recipient, you have received this email in error and use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error please contact the sender.   

Although our computer systems use active virus protection software, and we take various measures to reduce the risk of viruses being transmitted in e-mail messages and attachments sent from this company, we cannot guarantee that such e-mail messages and attachments are free from viruses on receipt.  It is a condition of our using e-mail to correspond with you, that any and all liability on our part arising directly or indirectly out of any virus is excluded.  Please ensure that you run virus checking software on all e-mail messages and attachments before reading them.

--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Joel Winarske" <joelw@i...> wrote:

> An interesting side note is the MAC7100 series came up with the
smallest 
> code density on some quick IAR compilation tests.  I've been meaning
to drop 
> IAR an email about this.

Hello,

I think this is because MAC7100 are big endian, which has probably
less optimizer support than more common little endian arm7
controllers.

just started a MAC7100 specific group:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MAC7100/messages

regards
Patrick

On 19 Aug 2005 at 15:08, Tim Wade wrote:

> The MAC7100 series looks interesting. My current interest is really in
> a very small footprint device with USB so I think that the SAM7 will
> be the go. In some respects it was a bit of a sad day that Motorola
> rolled over and canned the 68K and went ARM. But then again it is nice
> not having to replace all the devlopment tools every project! ;-)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lpc2000@yahoogroups.com [mailto:lpc2000@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Joel Winarske Sent: Friday, 19 August 2005 2:34 PM To:
> lpc2000@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lpc2000] FullCAN
> 
> Freescale has an interesting new offering, the MAC7100 series.  But no
> clear answer on production eta.  It seems Freescale has taken the
> route of more RAM like ST. An interesting side note is the MAC7100
> series came up with the smallest code density on some quick IAR
> compilation tests.  I've been meaning to drop IAR an email about this.

The MAC7111MPV40 is available from http://www.ebv.com. I had no problem
buying 2 even though on the web site they specify a minimum of 60.

Regards
  Anton Erasmus


-- 
A J Erasmus

>> Freescale has an interesting new offering, the MAC7100 series.  But no
>> clear answer on production eta.  It seems Freescale has taken the
>> route of more RAM like ST. An interesting side note is the MAC7100
>> series came up with the smallest code density on some quick IAR
>> compilation tests.  I've been meaning to drop IAR an email about this.
>
> The MAC7111MPV40 is available from http://www.ebv.com. I had no problem
> buying 2 even though on the web site they specify a minimum of 60.
>

I was looking at the MAC7141.  Only a few MAC71X1 part numbers are currently 
available.  The ol' vaporware trick.


Joel