Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Thread

A DIP LPC2000 chip? [was "new poll"]

A DIP LPC2000 chip? [was "new poll"]

2005-09-30 by Pont, Dr M.J.

> From: "Michael Rubitschka" 
...
> Real enginneers use smd ;-)

I agree completely!

However, one of the joys in teaching embedded systems is having people develop their first programs (to flash an LED), then get them to build the COMPLETE system on a breadboard.  When it works, people really begin to appreciate the differences between "embedded" and "desktop" systems.  They don't forget this - and many are hooked for life (that's part of my job description...). 

Of course - two weeks later - we want to use SMDs, CAN, JTAG, etc - that's fine.  But those first few lab experiments with breadboards are important.

For Philips, this - a spacial "DIP chip for teaching" almost certainly - makes no economic sense (but they might find that those first experiments have made a lasting impression?)

And if Philips don't want to do this, the various links to small DIP boards offer a good alternative - thank you.

Best wishes,

Michael.


+======================================+

 Michael J. Pont, PhD
 Embedded Systems Laboratory,
 University of Leicester

 http://www.le.ac.uk/eg/mjp9/

+======================================+

RE: [lpc2000] A DIP LPC2000 chip? [was "new poll"]

2005-09-30 by Michael Rubitschka

Hi Michael

Why not use an f.e. avr (Mega8,16,32) for this first impressions ?
The toolchain if you use GCC is verry simmilar and
a later upgrade to the real man 32 bit chips should not be a problem.

Cheers
Michael
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>From: "Pont, Dr M.J." <Michael.Pont@...>
>Reply-To: lpc2000@yahoogroups.com
>To: <lpc2000@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: [lpc2000] A DIP LPC2000 chip?  [was "new poll"]
>Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 11:16:27 +0000
>
>
> > From: "Michael Rubitschka"
>...
> > Real enginneers use smd ;-)
>
>I agree completely!
>
>However, one of the joys in teaching embedded systems is having people 
>develop their first programs (to flash an LED), then get them to build the 
>COMPLETE system on a breadboard.  When it works, people really begin to 
>appreciate the differences between "embedded" and "desktop" systems.  They 
>don't forget this - and many are hooked for life (that's part of my job 
>description...).
>
>Of course - two weeks later - we want to use SMDs, CAN, JTAG, etc - that's 
>fine.  But those first few lab experiments with breadboards are important.
>
>For Philips, this - a spacial "DIP chip for teaching" almost certainly - 
>makes no economic sense (but they might find that those first experiments 
>have made a lasting impression?)
>
>And if Philips don't want to do this, the various links to small DIP boards 
>offer a good alternative - thank you.
>
>Best wishes,
>
>Michael.
>
>
>+======================================+
>
>  Michael J. Pont, PhD
>  Embedded Systems Laboratory,
>  University of Leicester
>
>  http://www.le.ac.uk/eg/mjp9/
>
>+======================================+
>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.