Lpc2000

Guys,

Did Philips finally say something about the CAN issue with extended 
frames? Someone talked about it here but Philips didn't seem to want 
to add ti to the errata!

Is there a work around for the problem? We must use extended frames 
for this application.

Thanks,

Gus

Gus,

help me out, which CAN issue with extended frames? The Errata Sheet 
for LPC21x9 or the other devices with CAN lists the known issues. 

Besides that, the CAN is going to be fixed, all problems will be gone. 
Ramping up the fixed silicon is expected for Q1/06

hth, Robert


--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Gus" <gus_is_working@y...> wrote:

> Guys,
> 
> Did Philips finally say something about the CAN issue with extended 
> frames? Someone talked about it here but Philips didn't seem to want 
> to add ti to the errata!
> 
> Is there a work around for the problem? We must use extended frames 
> for this application.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gus

someone on the list said that there is a problem where if an 
extended frame lost arbitration, it will get corrupted! He also said 
that he confirmed the problem with philips but it is not in the 
errata!

Is this correct?

Gus
--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "philips_apps" <philips_apps@y...> 
wrote:
> Gus,
> 
> help me out, which CAN issue with extended frames? The Errata 
Sheet 
> for LPC21x9 or the other devices with CAN lists the known issues. 
> 
> Besides that, the CAN is going to be fixed, all problems will be 
gone. 
> Ramping up the fixed silicon is expected for Q1/06
> 
> hth, Robert
> 
> 
> --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Gus" <gus_is_working@y...> wrote:
> > Guys,
> > 
> > Did Philips finally say something about the CAN issue with 
extended 
> > frames? Someone talked about it here but Philips didn't seem to 
want 
> > to add ti to the errata!
> > 
> > Is there a work around for the problem? We must use extended 
frames 

> > for this application.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Gus