Oliver Fromme wrote: > Hi, > > First of all, thank you very much for creating milter- > greylist. It really helps a lot. > > Now I've got a question. My MX server gets a lot of > probes from spammers for mail accounts that don't exist. > That is, I have thousands of these in my logs: > > Jan 20 00:01:19 [...] <guirre@mydomain>... User unknown > Jan 20 00:01:19 [...] <gulfier@mydomain>... User unknown > Jan 20 00:01:20 [...] <gullit@mydomain>... User unknown > Jan 20 00:01:21 [...] <gummo@mydomain>... User unknown > > After installing milter-greylist, all of those are > greylisted: > > Jan 20 13:17:44 [...] to <arioch@mydomain> delayed for 00:03:00 > Jan 20 13:17:56 [...] to <arjani@mydomain> delayed for 00:03:00 > Jan 20 13:18:33 [...] to <arkeen@mydomain> delayed for 00:03:00 > Jan 20 13:18:34 [...] to <arkosic@mydomain> delayed for 00:03:00 > > Those just take up space in the greylist for no reason. > In fact, 99% of the contents of my dump file is from > such useless probes. And the address harvester might > even come back and probe the same account again. > > Is it possible _not_ to greylist those, but reject the > mails permanently (and immediately)? In other words, > a permanent "User unknow" should take precedence over > temporary greylisting. I asked this a long time ago. Unfortunately, with the Sendmail Milter API this isn't possible without changing to post-data-phase greylisting, which has a lot of problems with excessive bandwidth consumption. You can add on another milter to run ahead of milter-greylist. This is a little silly, but unfortunately it's the only way to get user-validation before greylisting.
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] Greylist vs. unknown users
2006-01-20 by Matt Kettler
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.