On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: ED> ED> The spam traps would be e-mail addresses released in web pages. The ED> DSTnet would work by exchanging messages in real time from site to ED> site. I already wrote the software that does that. ED> I had a page on my website for a few weeks during 2004 with my musings on co-operative spam fighting (The page is still there http://www.clifford.ac/cooperativespamfighting.html and is visited by crawlers and I get email to the example honeypot address, even though there are no links to it from my website). My premise then was, basically, that if everyone in the world had a second email address, indistinguishable from a real address, and the databases of the spamming fraternity could be polluted with those addresses, then spam to real addresses would be halved. What if we all had a thousand false addresses? Expanding on that, suppose I gave you a subdomain (like as done at http://www.projecthoneypot.org)) such that any mail sent to, say, @...-seine.net, was sent to, and accepted by, your server. You (you being some co-operative entity) would pollute the spamworld with addresses at donated subdomains and collect the ips of any mail sent to those addresses. Your scoring scheme, with the score rising and falling over time, would fit in here. If you received a large quantity of spam to the honeypot domains, even from legitmate isp servers, then they would deserve to be blacklisted. You could publish a level such as "192.168.0.1 has emitted spam at a rate of 1500 per hour over the past 24 hours" and I, as a user, could decide what trigger level to put in the milter that you are going to write. Maybe this has all been tried before, I don't know. However, I think the key is publicity. If a large ISP gets a "Drefus score" above 1000, they need to be outed in the national and international press and that would need to be worked on as well as the technical side. -- Alan ( Please do not email me AS WELL as replying to the list. Please address personal email to alan+1@ as lists@ is not read. A password autoresponder may be invoked if this email is very old. )
Message
Re: [RFC] distributed spam traps, improved
2006-04-04 by Alan Clifford
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.