Milter-greylist

--- In milter-greylist@yahoogroups.com, manu@n... wrote:
> Anyway, I understant what your problem is. In order to reduce the
> maintenance trouble for you on each upgrade, we could integrate your
> patch with ifdef's that disable it by default. Would that be satisfying
> for you? It would be marked as unsupported in future releases in the
> doc, and the day we change the way it works, that will only burn the
> users that have readen the doc and enabled that feature. 

Yes this would work for me. As long as you test new releases that it
doesn't break the patch :-)

-Dan