Hi Emmanuel, > Adam Katz <yegsa-yahoo@...> wrote: > > > To milter-greylist developers (manu): does this look worthwhile to > > implement? given the "peer" option, this is already mostly written. > > What is it? > > And by the way, I'm a bit tired of implementing stuff for which > there is no feedback at all (DKIM, p0f)... I'm the DKIM culprit (requester) there so if I've annoyed you I do apologise. I was meaning to assist in testing the DKIM implementation you did but I have just not had the chance unfortunately. When I did try on weekend, I couldn't really figure out how to compile the dkim library and when delving more into it my UPS at home went down so ended up hunting for new batteries, then my notebook doesn't boot into the OS any more (hardware fault) which I'm currently working out with HP (it's under warranty but still, takes time to go through their process). So I've had little opportunity to tackle these things. The DKIM request was to tackle spam from yahoo.tld's, who use Sender ID. However I would like to say thank you for milter-greylist, for your quick responses, support and for your implementations. milter-greylist and it's "additional features" (SPF, rdnsbl, etc) have made such a difference to spam getting into the environment for me, it's now the most important spam fighting tool I have in my arsenal. Without it things would be terrible. Thanks. Michael. > -- > Emmanuel Dreyfus > http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz > manu@... > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] has anybody tried p2pwl (shared auto-whitelists)?
2008-09-23 by Michael Mansour
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.