On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 01:54:34AM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote: > rcpt /grandma@...,user@.../ > > In the former example, user@... would not greylist anything, everyone > would get through without grelisting. In the latter example, only > grandma@... is whitelisted, everyone else sending mail to > user@... would be greylisted. > > Regex works on both sender or receiver in the rcpt clause. The feature is nice and desirable but I have concerns with the syntax. rcpt means recipient, it sounds weird to add the sender. What about introducing a new keyword? (it would probably make the parser simplier) Another starnge thing is that I'd expect /grandma@...,user@.../ to be single regex, what about this? /grandma@.../ /user@.../ We could do something like this: rcptfrom grandma@... user@... rcptfrom grandma@... /.*/ I'm not happy with "rcptfrom", I think we can find better. What do you think? Another problem is that it does not cope very well with the rcpt-acl idea. Maybe we can come to a much more general acl syntax. Anyone has a proposition? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@...
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] Patch to milter-greylist - adds norcpt keyword
2004-09-30 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.